We’re in this together! Stay safe with our COVID-19 guide


Rodney L.

Level 3 Contributor

Contributor Level

Total Points

About Me


How I Can Help

Being a web developer passionate about my craft allows me to bring that knowledge to bear on my reviews to not just criticize, but to do my best to compassionately help fellow website owners and website developers build better web presences. Feel free to contact me to review your website and/or privately ask any questions you may have about optimizing your Internet presence.


Love, God, food, books, music, movies

16 Reviews by Rodney


It is extremely sad if you don't already know about Project Gutenberg, the online library of thousands of public domain books that can be downloaded legally and for free. For the benefit of the public in general, everything an author has published loses its copyright 70 or so years after said author dies. These works "go into the public domain," meaning that anyone can duplicate and distribute them as they wish.

Project Gutenberg has been in operation since long before most folks had ever heard of an Internet, back in 1971 with a digitization of the United States Declaration of Independence. Project Gutenberg volunteers all around the world take books whose copyrights have expired and add them to the organization's website for people like you and me to enjoy free of charge.

These are not crappy insufferable 'books' by crackpot so-called self published authors but real works of world renown by well-known authors. Project Gutenberg has over 57,000 titles as of this writing and with limited resources just like any organization they take care to publish relevant material. They have pretty much every English-language book from before the 20th century that most people could think of as a classic.

It's sad to me that I feel I have to explain the concept of public domain to folks that I feel should already know, but at the risk of coming off pedantic I have to take the risk to help stem the tide against people acting thoughtlessly. It's unfortunate that most know of Hulu or Netflix but not of an at least marginally more valuable contribution to society like Project Gutenberg, whose products are free and have a greater chance of contributing your moral development and happiness.

It's important to note for speakers of other languages in addition to or instead of English, that there are many other Project Gutenberg spinoffs for other countries and languages. They have permission to use the Project Gutenberg name but otherwise are entirely separate organizations. A lot of these projects have extensive offerings. Notably, the German spinoff have all the psychology classics, naturally in their original German.

So do yourself and the world a favor and instead of another boring episode of Friends from your favorite video streaming service (after all, friends don't let friends watch Friends) how about a night of "Gutenberg n' chill" instead?


I really do want to tell the whole world about this website! Not only can you learn a number of topics to an advanced level in science, engineering, technology and math, but many large influential commercial organizations prospect for talent here.

This website can teach you a number of different STEM subjects using proven teaching techniques. It is a pay website costing over US$100 per year but don't think that you're paying to not have to put effort in. Subjects include algebra, calculus, celestial mechanics, astronomy, logic, probability, and way too many more for me to list off here. The website promises many more to come.

Subjects are divided up into units, which are further divided into bite-sized lessons not much longer than the height of the average person's screen. Users have the opportunity to answer the question of the exercise each lesson is based on and then if they wish view solutions proposed by the learning community.

Again, these are NSF-supported pedagogical methods. This is the delivery of educational services with heretofore unprecedented efficiency.

Before you move onto the next thing in this short-attention-span-theater world we live in, check out the Wikipedia article for 'Brilliant.org' and look at the big name sources cited. Also, be sure to look up founder Sue Khim's TEDxUChicago speech where she talks about the aptitude discovery part of Brilliant.org's mission.

I joined up because I want to learn calculus. I am the computer programmer with better language skills than math skills. I am also amazed at what can be done by math with those who have an advanced understanding of it. I realize in order to be able to do some of the cooler things that can be done with programming I will need to know enough about math to understand calculus.

When I read code rundowns of algorithms that involve high math I quickly get lost in an assault of mathematical jargon that might as well be Klingon. I want to be able to understand it. Some have compared the abilities of computer programmers to that of sorcerers. As someone who can't dig ditches I strive for some semblance of tangibility in my productivity. I think a firm grasp of advanced math would give my code that quality that graphic designers call 'pop.'

I'm convinced that if I'm capable of learning at all, this website can teach me. I got the first year on special at 20% discount. Shortly thereafter they started trying to upsell the lifetime subscription. Noticing the cost of a lifetime subscription go up a few bucks a day I soon went for it, afraid of kicking myself later if I didn't, with that old cautionary tale in mind we all heard about being close to the end and regretting what wasn't done more than what was done. So I went for it.

I tell you this because that's how much I believe in this project. I hope that not only my financial investment but quest for learning and knowledge helps to raise the bar in some little tiny way at least for everyone.

Tip for consumers:
Become a member of this community! Paying for a subscription will galvanize your resolve and commitment and it will prove there is market demand for these crucial services!


I love loading up the flight sim and setting everything up to be as realistic as possible so I can feel like my experience was as close to a real pilot's as possible. The hardest part of getting the place ready to go is having the creativity to find a stimulating location to take off from and another to fly to.

Prepping and inspecting the 737 for T/O? No prob. Finding a place on this big planet to fly to that will be interesting and novel? Not quite as easy as you might think.

FunPlacesToFly.com is the web resource that I've been searching for my whole life. Of enormous value to both real life and virtual pilots like me, this data-driven website has nothing to do with the potentially legally messy matter of teaching the user anything about the skill of flying or airplanes, but instead proposes to us cool, interesting, and usually scenic routes to fly.

While I do highly recommend FunPlacesToFly.com I would be remiss in not mentioning some weaknesses. The pages of the site are a bit cluttered, and the airport lookup functionality merely uses APIs to draw information in from a couple sources to repackage that info in a manner that is pretty worthless. Also, I think you could increase revenue by decluttering the site and putting all the monetization content in a small single area of all the pages on the site and labeling it in such a way that will make folks want to contribute.

I have to give this site four stars because I give out five stars exceedingly rarely. Again I highly recommend this website that easily lives up to its name. When I want a cool place to go I'll be looking to FunPlacesToFly.com or anxiously waiting their next mailer.

Tip for consumers:
Don't forget to take advantage of this site's search functionality as well as its browsing capability. In addition, don't forget to sign up for the emailer which will no doubt provide unexpected yet timely flight inspiration.

Just remember that you have to put the flight sim down at some point so you can take care of other aspects of your life like eating and sleeping and paying bills so ... um ... you can continue to fly around in flight sim. Yay!


This site is one of a dozen or so go-to websites that I rely on for my work. They employ a lot of skilled talent. Writers not only write easy-to-read text, but are very knowledgeable without always taking themselves too seriously all the time.

Eurogamer is often privy to exclusive interviews and content. When not the first to break a story, however, they are happy to credit even a competitor. I also enjoy a number of stories more analytical, anecdotal, and philosophical than straight-up news.

One example of journalistic excellence I really have to recommend is "Night and the City" by Christian Donlan, a touching experience of the author playing L. A. Noire with his father, who was a police officer in Los Angeles during the time the game was set in.

I could list of several authors that have been regularly supplying content to Eurogamer for years and therefore know much more about the video gaming community than I ever will. Eurogamer and I think that people of all genders have something to add to the gaming community. Sorry for being in touch with my inner hippie for a sec here but I personally enjoy the energy that female video gamers bring to the table.

Two issues they need to work on include cleaning the cruft out of URLs and they must stop changing URLs or the resource a url points to.

Type into your favorite search engine "avoiding URL cruft" if you need to. I would normally point you to Wikipedia but I don't think their definition of 'cruft' is helpful.

I am currently looking at a Eurogamer.net URL with a slug (that's the part of the URL, usually at the end, that differentiates one article from another) that ends with '5795', an apparently randomly-generated number entirely superfluous to the content of the article and therefore has no place in the URL for the sake's of both SEO and proper ui design.

For folks like me cruft-free URLs are one of many signs of a healthy software ecosystem under the hood.

The next issue is that for the weekly updates on some games they reuse the URL for last week, switching out all old content for new. My choice, again for SEO's sake, would be to generate new unique slugs for new articles, never taking the old one's down.

Overall, when I think of video gaming news I think of the bright blue mast of Eurogamer.net, I really do. Eurogamer's been around since I can remember and I'd be willing to bet it will be for quite awhile.

Tip for consumers:
If you save a URL it might be changed if they update it, replacing the old date in the URL with the new one.


The developers of Django, the finest of web application development frameworks, have spent a lot of time pondering the best practices that go into making websites great. Forged in a fast-paced newsroom environment, Django helps the developer walk the tightrope over having to get work done and needing that work to be of very high quality. It often does this with elegance.

It should come as no surprise that the home of the global Django community is built with the values of that community. Like any great website the layout both looks great and conveys meaning how well information is placed and can be easily accessed. The same information is presented in multiple ways for the advanced Django developer or the newbie, and it is clear for both visitors where to get this information. I do find for some of the more obscure topics that it is easier to search the site through a search engine that to try to navigate down six or seven levels of links.

All in all, I have watched this website and its product evolve over the years from a site that was initially pretty good. Django is a great developer tool and its community's home is a great example of how to build a user-centered, information-packed website.

Tip for consumers:
The learning curve is quite steep. Be sure to seek additional resources to complement the great, quality tutorials and reference materials that can sometimes be beyond the novice Django developer's level.


Gmail is my primary email account. Being a full-featured account, the interface can be cluttered and all of the settings can be overwhelming at times, but I don't trust any other provider as much with my need to maintain lines of communication with friend, colleagues, employers and government caseworkers.

I make extensive use of Gmail's labels, which work more like tags instead of the folders that other email providers have you organize your emails into. You can assign multiple labels to a piece of email and you can have these labels automatically assigned to incoming mail based on a variety of criteria. To keep my Inbox from getting flooded (I get about 120 a day) I have a lot of my email, especially those that come from mailing lists, skip the Inbox and get automatically labeled and archived.

Your Google account comes with 10 gigabytes of storage that you can use for email or for file storage with Google Drive. The cool part is that every second that passes, whether you are logged in or not, a couple more kilobytes are added your overall storage capacity.

I'm sure that with Google, as long as I don't abuse my account by sending spam or using it in some other unauthorized way, I will never have to endure the hassle of moving my e-mail somewhere else.


YouTube (owned and operated by Google) is the premier site for user-uploaded videos. If you can't find anything to watch on the boob tube, you can definitely find something on YouTube. With a Google account (required for a YouTube account) you can upload an unlimited number of videos, just make sure you own the content and/or you have the right to publish it. I'm sure hundreds of accounts are deleted daily because people like to upload video that is not theirs to upload.

Coming from Google, YouTube has a slick, easy to use interface that is relatively well organized. I really like how I can organize videos I want to be able to easily find into an unlimited number of playlists. I do wish I could reorder my list of playlists, however. I keep a playlist of music videos, another playlist of movie trailers, another with all humorous videos. Your playlists are public by default but can be made private. My username there is 'pyrodney' if you'd like to see how I organize my account.

One major annoyance is with video buffering. With any video being streamed (meaning that you're watching it as it downloads, rather than watching it later, after it has finished downloading), whether from YouTube or some other place on the Internet, ideally the video downloads a little faster than you can watch it. However, when the video takes longer to download than the speed at which it can be watched, the video will freeze momentarily. If you can see this happening, you must pause the video so it can continue buffering so you can watch it uninterrupted. Unfortunately, YouTube doesn't let you pause the video when it is in this frozen state, so if you fail to pause it before it freezes you can get stuck in this loop of the video only playing for a fraction of a second, freezing, playing for a fraction of a second again, then freezing again, over and over. This gets real old quickly. It would be nice if Google's programmers would work on a more intelligent buffering algorithm so this doesn't happen.

Each user's content is aggregated into what YouTube calls a 'channel,' and users can subscribe to other users' channels. YouTube has made this particular feature a lot more useful (finally) allowing you to organize your subscriptions into what they call 'collections.' You can click the name of one of your collections and see a list of all the most recent videos from all the channels in that collection. I do wish I could make my collections publicly visible and otherwise shareable

Aside from a great place to watch videos, YouTube is a great way to complement the marketing efforts of your other online or brick-and-mortar endeavors. Those most successful with YouTube are able to communicate their message in an entertaining way such that many of its viewers choose to recommend or 'share' the video with their social media contacts. A video that spreads in this way is called 'viral,' and this is the holy grail of Internet marketing.


I would really like to give this site five stars. Essentially "Mechanical Turk Requesters" ask mturk.com to accomplish a set of tasks, tasks that "Mechanical Turk Workers" then accomplish. Requesters and Workers need never actually contact each other.

I think automating the relationship of people who need to get tasks done and people who want to accomplish these tasks for some kind of incentive in the fashion that "Amazon's Mechanical Turk" does this is awesome and could most likely be the future of a large portion of labor.

It disheartens me, however, that a lot of this work is antithetical to the hacker ethic in specific and putting human potential to its highest, best use in that it can not only be quite a bit tedious at times but also not compensate very well for the amount of work involved. Compounding this, instructions with some Requesters can be very vague and as you get no instantaneous feedback on your work, this can damage your ratings, restricting you from being able to take on more choice tasks, if you do a lot of tasks in a row incorrectly.

Also, I am too often left only hoping that the goals of the tasks I take on are in agreement with my own values.


Amazon.com is the Internet's most trusted and reliable department store. It's great not only for purchasing products and product research, but is also an effective place to conduct research on all types of topics.

Started as an online bookstore in Jeff Bezos' Bellevue, WA garage in 1995, when online stores of any kind were rare and novel, Amazon.com has become much more than merely the top place to shop for nearly anything. Amazon.com has become a full-blown Internet portal to compete with Yahoo!, Microsoft and Google, offering account holders for free in many cases many cloud storage and processing services, as well as spawning or acquiring a diverse set of other, non-flagship online properties.

Many don't know Amazon has owned the popular and indispensable Internet Movie Database (imdb.com) since 1998. They run alexa.com, providers of information about web traffic. Amazon Mechanical Turk (mturk.com), wihose slogan "Artificial Artificial Intelligence" always gets a light chuckle from me, is a great place to make a little extra cash or find some humans to do tasks online that only humans can do. Zappos.com is a repackaging of their shoe and shoe-related offerings. And in 2013 Amazon.com gobbled up goodreads.com, a book lover's social networking site.

I'm sure they're not perfect, but speaking only for myself I have ordered many kinds items here and thee through the years and I have never had a problem. Most recently I ordered my first 64-bit system in many different pieces and orders through them and all the parts have shown up on time or early and all the parts were what they were supposed to be, as, dealing with a firm as well-known and established as Amazon is, I expected them to be.


Keep in mind the number of stars I award is based the merits of the website alone. In fairness to the other reviewers that have chosen to assess the company's performance in other areas I used to own a Dell and thought it was rather low quality, at this time I have no plans to own one again.

Their site is pretty well designed. The colors go well together and the text is easy to read. There are multiple ways to view their product lines, through a menu bar system right below the mast or a set of links at the bottom of the page. A highlight are the extensive and very user forums on quite an array of subjects. They also offer several ways to get technical support, whether through their automated online system, by filling out a form and receiving an e-mail response, or via the olde timey telephone technology.

On some pages the site layout is on the verge of being too cluttered. What is a particularly egregious violation of web design best practices is the Alienware (Alienware was bought by Dell in 2006) link that unexpectedly takes you from dell.com to alienware.com. Best practices indicate you do not place a link that takes the user offsite among links that merely lead to other pages within the same website.


IMDb and Wikipedia are *the* go to places for learning about movies. I love how you can keep as many lists as you like of not only movies but actors. Just like Spotify helps me keep track of music I like, imdb.com, or the Internet Movie Database, helps me organize the movies I've seen into lists. The interface is pretty clean and uncluttered but most importantly has remained consistent. The biggest problem is user-created lists with ugly ID number URLs.

I do wish they would go to the next level with the site's social networking features. At the very least they should let you 'friend' other members and allow more comprehensive member profiles with clean URLs that make them easy to share and SEO friendly. Optimally I'd like to see more of a full-blown social network for movie lovers. It would also incentivize and therefore explode web 2.0-style content development if, since IMDb is owned by Amazon.com anyway, members received a commission for any purchases that were made through their content, whether that be a movie review (each review by each author should have its very own clean URL), a list, or the member's profile page.


The creators of the Litter Kwitter product seem to be the ones responsible for this particular website. Keep in mind I don't own a Litter Kwitter and this review is of their website only. This review is in no way any kind of assessment of the actual Litter Kwitter product.

The site very effectively uses various multimedia elements (text, graphics and videos) to explain what the product is. They also establish credibility for their product by featuring pages devoted to showing how it works in detail (scary, I know), the product's television appearances, testimonials, and, especially helpful, a user forum not only to foster two-way communication between the product's creators and customers. You can buy online directly through them or if you're unfomfortable with that, or want to see the Litter Kwitter in person first, they have a large list of major, well-known pet product retailers.

The only things I didn't like were the mailto hyperlink in lieu of a form on the contact page and I thought the solid background colors for the body and mast were a bit unimaginative. A bolder choice would've been perhaps textured or photographic backgrounds. Otherwise this is pretty much a model product website!


I have this pet peeve that if any forum, whether it be a website or any other medium, allows just any old person to come by and 'publish' whatever, that that's not really 'getting published' in the strictest sense of the term.

If you take $10,000 and go get hundreds of copies of your chicken scratch printed up, I really don't consider you to have been 'published' nor do I consider you to be a 'published author' based on that alone. If you were to submit an agented or unagented manuscript to a real book publisher where some manuscript are selected for printing but a majority end up in the garbage, and they chose to print up multitudes of copies of your submission, then I would think of you as 'published.'

At ezinearticles.com anyone can 'publish' anything with little to no editorial oversight or quality assurance. None of the articles I saw cited any sources much less reputable ones. ezinearticles.com bills itself as a place to enhance your credentials and establish your expertise but getting 'published' there would actually detract from your credibility in my eyes.


While the layout and page design kind of sucks, this website does a fairly decent job showing users places in Illinois to bicycle. The purpose of the website is to sell the author's book, yet there is enough free content to keep the Illinois bike path enthusiast coming back for more. The author could make his site a lot better by coming up with a better layout, rounding out the multimedia with some YouTube videos, adding some social media like a forum or user profiles, and perhaps even having an in-browser game or two custom made.


Site design and layout is great, unfortunately that is the only good thing about this site. It's name, "Blurtit," is very apt. People cavalierly give glib advice about all sorts of sensitive topics with a lot less input from quality control mechanisms than the leading Q&A sites. There are no user profiles for users to proffer their credentials or qualifications. There are no citings of sources.

Their About page says they (whoever they are, it never discloses) "wanted to create a new online community which would allow people from all over the world to share their knowledge" and that they brought the site into production in June of '06 "after months of hard work and research." I find this humorous as their claim to have put a lot of effort into this site seems to be a bit wanting in credibility.

Skip this site for one of their numerous competitors.


This website feels very spammy. Even though articles are relatively well written and typo-free, there is no adequate information about the authors or their credentials, and there is no reputation information on the Net. It seems like the intent is to try to cultivate a good reputation and then exploit that reputation later on with spam or malware. The content is most likely plagiarized. The site creators likely don't have altruistic motives here. Particularly suspicious is how all of the forum postings have little to no grammar or spelling errors and feel like they're written by the same author.

Rodney Has Earned 47 Votes

Rodney L.'s review of YouTube earned 9 Very Helpful votes

Rodney L.'s review of Litter Kwitter earned 2 Very Helpful votes

Rodney L.'s review of Gutenberg earned 2 Very Helpful votes

Rodney L.'s review of Gmail earned 3 Very Helpful votes

Rodney L.'s review of Brilliant earned a Very Helpful vote

Rodney L.'s review of Funplacestofly earned a Very Helpful vote

Rodney L.'s review of cancersymptoms.org earned a Fraud Buster vote

Rodney L.'s review of Django earned a Very Helpful vote

Rodney L.'s review of Amazon Mechanical Turk earned 15 Very Helpful votes

Rodney L.'s review of Blurtit earned 2 Very Helpful votes

Rodney L.'s review of EzineArticles earned 4 Very Helpful votes

Rodney L.'s review of Dell earned 2 Very Helpful votes

Rodney L.'s review of Amazon earned a Very Helpful vote

Rodney L.'s review of IMDb earned a Very Helpful vote

Rodney L.'s review of cancersymptoms.org earned a Very Helpful vote

Rodney L.'s review of Biking Illinois earned a Very Helpful vote

Rodney Has Received 1 Thank You

Tina E. thanked you for your review of Gutenberg

“Thanks Rodney for going to all that trouble - I will certainly be using Project Gutenberg! I haven't until now because I had never heard of it until now”

Rodney Has 1 Fan

  • Reviews


  • Votes


Tony F.

Rodney is Following 4 Users

Frank C.
Clayton R.
  • Reviews


  • Votes


Tony F.
  • Reviews


  • Votes


Mathew G.


Similar Reviewers on Sitejabber


Great project, lots of books in a variety of formats and really well done. Don't know what else...


Nothing bad about free books. Yes, they are old, but they are classics, so you can do a lot...