Their articles are based on sheer opinion, no facts what so ever. You can take any of their articles and find that they made up the information just for clicks. They have zero knowledge of what they are writing about. It's sad that journalism has come down to this. The internet is filled with trash and VOX media is part of the heap. Almost as untruthful as CNN. If regulations were created to keep the written articles based on truth and facts, this gathering of liberal children would become nothing more than a forgotten concept.
Vox bans for random comments on blogs unrelated to them entirely. It is a large conglomerate that includes SBNation and others. The news is biased and left-wing. About as bad (and newsworthy) as Buzzfeed.
Vox is left wing biased and give fake news on abstract theories that cannot be proven because they are lies, such as the claims that CO2 can warm the earth or that the coronavirus is this terrible plague that's gonna kill us all, even though it's really only a bad flu (cause flu kills people too)
In the Elaine from Seinfeld, the author has to throw in that they were 8 years old and gay. Wtf people! There is no way someone knows they're gay at that age. Their brains haven't hit that level of maturity yet. Unless it was a parent that led the child to believe they're gay. 8 year olds can't be gay! Has common sense just vanished in the last 5 years. Vox should be ashamed to support this kind of crap let alone hire writers with those kind of beliefs.
The article I read about having COVID safe gatherings got a little silly when the began to describe testing your guests. Not a lot of discussion using sources like the CDC rather than commercial news. Vox has a lot of ads too, which makes me suspicious.
I think Vox failed to give a lot of information about home testing and it's problems. The CDC has consistently favored masking distancing, and gathering outside as the safest ways to be social. Please use science, not opinions and unrecognized sources to write your articles. (My rules as a university educator: seldom use a ", com" source. Favor ". Gov,. Edu,. Org" sources. Always look for multiple agreeing sources.)
I have seen, lately several short articles from Vox.com. First who the heck are they? Next, who are they trying to Be? CNN? If this is the company goal, you need to rethink your focus. We don't need another do nothing media source, but yet here we have one called VOX.com. They write about what hillary has to say, YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING. No one cares about hillary or her lies, no one cares about the make believe heading YOU are writing. Another Watergate, can we reverse a hacked presidential election. The answer is NO obama has already completed his horrific reign. Now if you are referring to President Trump, YOU or anyone else has NO information of any election being hacked which allowed Trump to win. President Trump would always win over hillary, because like you, VOX.com, hillary lies, she is self indulgent, and down right crooked.
So, getting back to my original point, Vox.com, if you want to report news, then do so, this will be helpful to the American public, if you want to make up news, then go ahead but remember you will have NO credibility just like cnn and hillary. Hey it's your company, you are in charge or growth or not.
This propaganda machine makes Fox look mild. Every article is framed in an extremely biased way, including the actual article titles. Pathetic.