ReutersReviews 33

There's a big difference when it comes to politics and media, some or actually there's maybe just 1 media source that will actually tell the truth but it's def not this one. Once you realize the left has weaponized 99% of mainstream media sources and that the media are the biggest threat to Americans today the better off we will all be, it's time to leave these cooperations behind and start supporting independent sources where the real truth can be heard.

Aug 14 (Reuters) - Activist investor Elliott Investment Management has dissolved its stake in payments giant PayPal (PYPL.O), according to a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

FehlerAnzeige(oder) bei Reuter. Versprochene Lieferung sofort x 1 artikel, 1 Woche x 2te Artikel. Nach angekommene Zahlung werden es 3-5 Wochen weil 1 Artikel fehlt, natürlich der billigste. Partielle Lieferung zulasten de Kunde, obwohl mehr als 1200.- SFr Rechnung. Eine Name Ein Wort? Vielleicht:! WEGBLEIBEN!

These reporters are no longer credible, and going into the future I will take all news coverage from these communist sympathizers with a large brick of salt.

I've noticed a Russian and right wing bias in their reporting over past six years. Their funding is non transparent. This has happened to a number of other trusted Western news platforms as well.

All day today Reuters has been pushing lies to soften the blow to the rich hedge funds at the cost of the little guy. I am absolutely disappointed and will never be able to believe anything this outlet says. We need market news we can trust, not lies to make the rich richer and the poor poorer.

Reuter's ran a headline story last Friday (1/15) quoting Care ambulance services employee Eileen Cegarra, saying she was "overwhelmed" with calls, allegedly for "Covid." Having grown up in Los Angeles county area, where this ambulance service is located, I can assure you neither I nor anyone I know have ever heard of this company! And why would someone who thought they had "Covid" not go to their regular doctor, or an emergency room, or call 911 if they're having some kind of emergency symptoms -which seems extremely unlikely with a mild flu like symptoms of the alleged Covid, and the over 99% survival rate. So I called care ambulance services in Santa Fe Springs and spoke with Jennifer at the front desk. I asked her if they were truly overwhelmed with calls for people claiming they had Covid. "No". It was not true. She then got very nervous and would not put me through to speak with Eileen Cegarra. Reuter's journalists Norma Galeana and Alan Devall should be fired! This fear mongering story went out to all sorts of different news agencies and made front page headlines! And it is simply not true! And Reuters – where are the photos of the actual pandemic from your award-winning photo journalists? You have so many wonderful photographers and none have got photos to share from the middle of the "pandemic.?"

Reuters "news" source's writers have sunk to a new low. Their assessment of the July 2020 US political climate is so far off base with its readership that they, themselves, have become what can only be termed propagandists. The time-honored profession of actual journalism is only a memory of past times when Edward R. Morrow types reported facts. That hardly applies anymore. In all honesty, Reuters seems far too partial to divisive ideologies to report accurate facts or tell the truth.

"That the integrity, independence, and freedom from bias of Thomson Reuters shall at all times be fully preserved"

Reuters reporting has become heavily editorialized as of late, especially during the Trump era. It has swung heavily left lately with regards to immigration, China, and coverage of American politics.

Last year, Reuters didn't write a single article about a serial killer who killed upwards 20 white people. Billy Chemirmir. Why was that?

Why wasn't this considered newsworthy, but an argument in a dog park was national news for them? They have an agenda, and use gatekeeping to determine what people should see instead of what is actually newsworthy.

I'm a left leaning guy, but between Reuters and the ACLU I've lost faith in a lot of institutions that used to have integrity.

A friend told me they only read current affairs from Reuters as they can be trusted to tell a story without choosing left or right, at first I believed it but now I'm seeing a lot of stuff that doesn't make it to Reuters or Reuters turning a long 2 sided story into a short one sided one (bias). Also it's extremely annoying when you scroll down and the headlines keep repeating like just in case you want to read the same $#*! again and again. Also if your looking for news out of south east Asia Reuters believes that's called china. Its not

Got to love when folks nails media sites because of their political views. Fox, right wing bias, MSNBC left wing bias. Reuters does not show any of that from what I have read. More I tend to rely more on the research and community report from NewsGuard, AllSides, and Media Bias/Face Check, than disgruntled folks that have become just a little more toxic in their political opinions.The only thing I could potential say is wrong with Reuters is that it is lacking flash - all the bells and whistles that so many other news sites shove in your fact. Hummm, actually that is a great plus.