"That the integrity, independence, and freedom from bias of Thomson Reuters shall at all times be fully preserved"
Reuters reporting has become heavily editorialized as of late, especially during the Trump era. It has swung heavily left lately with regards to immigration, China, and coverage of American politics.
Last year, Reuters didn't write a single article about a serial killer who killed upwards 20 white people. Billy Chemirmir. Why was that?
Why wasn't this considered newsworthy, but an argument in a dog park was national news for them? They have an agenda, and use gatekeeping to determine what people should see instead of what is actually newsworthy.
I'm a left leaning guy, but between Reuters and the ACLU I've lost faith in a lot of institutions that used to have integrity.