The GuardianReviews 29

Absolutely bias and eating out of the democrats pockets. They'd lied on Trump and now begging for donations to get ahead of what's to come now that trump is FAIRLY going after them for their bias FAKE NEWS. I can literally source at least 5 of their articles that told blatant lies and contributed to the spread of misinformation. That's why they won't donations because they know they're guilty of spreading misinformation and need money to take on a couple of the RICHEST men in the world. This man's gonna sue tf out of them and still be able to run the nation without a single fault! They have zero clue what they're up against, he's a felon that never seen a day in jail and still got voted as president, cause he triumphant over the fake news. They went so hard with misinformation that they actually helped trump win office, the whole mainstream media did and now they want the public to pay for their crimes. Don't give them a red cent! They need to see the error of their ways. Media is suppose to be UNBIAS not leaning left or COMPLETELY left. You report the $#*!ing news how it is, not arrange it to lie and say whatever you want to put OUR PRESIDENT in a bad light. They've been doing it for over 8 years and it's about time they get their just reward for it. Don't give them a cent! They're the only media BEGGING for donations because they are a failure and hanging on by a thread as it is, they cant afford the smoke so they want YOU to pay for their mistakes! They LIED to you! They lied to AMERICA. They deserve all that's coming! Their workers don't even feel SAFE!

Horrible tried to destroy our children's. Full of pedos trash news pure bull$#*! the people talk we don't want you

Whenever there was a large amount of opinion thru bias, it's called "propaganda" not Journalism.

The articles about the Drag protests is filled with complete bias and the question I wonder is, "WHY"

Why is it full of bias? Why can't the supposed news site stick to facts.

For example, instead of "EXTREMISTS INTERRUPT DRAG STORY" it say, "Concerned Parents interrupt" "People who disagree interrupt" etc... What's with the label?

How are these people extremists?

When Republicans are being interrupted by Trans, they call it they don't use the word "Extremist" or "Neo-Nazi" etc...

I'm apparently a Neo Nazi because I don't agree with kids being involved in heightened sexual awakening while they're still in kindergarten? That makes me an extremist?

I'm giving the Guardian a 1 star based on the lack of intellect that goes into writing these articles, the understanding of definitions they use for their writing, the lack of literacy, and the continuous bias and propaganda filled information which misleads people from seeing the stories clearly from the point of view of, "How it happened"

Most of these supposed Journalists have seemed to forgo their education in order to gain "Likes" for being dramatic verses being real and honest. Shame on this company as well as the others who play the same games.

It shouldn't be allowed to exist as a journalist column and should be considered Puff Magazine at this point. They're for inciting reactions instead of publishing the truth.

They haven't once written an article on the concerns psychologically of introducing children to sexual ideals of changing their body parts, living without identity, etc... And there is actual research done that could show case both sides equally.

I'm done reading the Guardian.

Very thorough reporting. If you want to delve deep into the news, trust the Guardian. Planning on supporting this newspaper by donating. Great read!

I just read an article on Andrew Tate. The writer didn't mislead readers or take thing out of context, he outright lied. Where are all the FBI agents who were so concerned about misinformation that they felt the had to silence a sitting President on Twitter? This is not news. It's fiction.

I receive The Guardian through my email every morning and it is the first thing I read in the mornings. It is the most unbiased news I have found. Very interesting articles from around the world. No paywall but I do contribute to them occasionally because I like their unbiased news.

I needed to activate a new sensor I called waited over an hour. Finally get a call back and the guy tells me he does not have time to help me for me to call back tomorrow When they may have someone who has time to help me as he did not. I pay to much money for this service to have the attitude the customer service people has. I would never recommend this service. I also had an attempted break in and called to get a tech out so I could upgrade some services. I was informed there is no tech in my area it maybe months before I can get anyone. Do not purchase Guardian your safety is not important to them.

The quality has notably deteriorated. Very pro establishment newspaper full of bias, basically the "allowed" liberal news from the establishment point of view. Read Medialens and Glenn Greenwald for details. Famous for anti Assange and anti Corbyn and pro war campaigns.

Ryan refuses that he will take down a 6 year old news article about someone, they even write posts on people's mother's after they're dead bashing them because they had a life full of trauma and addiction struggles. Ryan is judgemental and just nasty. They agreed to removed Lauren Savoies article on her running over her husband with a car but Ryan and the news people at the guardian told Lauren they won't do it for someone like me. Pick and choose. Nasty newspaper. Should be put out of business.

The way The Guardian is going about liking Amber Heard (an abuser) to the #metoo movement is absolutely disgraceful to true survivors of gender-based violence and a total disregard for the jury's lawful verdict. Let go and move on instead of spitting hatred and violence towards a survivor, in this case a man.

Habitually posts misleading information and flat out wrong information. Credibility is gone and people like the ones who run The Guardian should not be allowed to manipulate the public. Sick!

The Guardian as most people know is an obvious left leaning news source that does not report favorably or most of the time at all on anything that has to do with conservatism or views resembling right leaning opinion. If you lean left this is a good news source for your views but it's certainly not real unbias news which is hard to find anywhere on both sides of the coin these days.

Id

Many years ago when the Guardian was the Manchester Guardian it was a progressive newspaper with integrity. These days the online Guardian has gone full bore with the current version of "political correctness." #MeToo; the penis is a lethal instrument; males--especially hetero males--are simply not to be trusted; the female body is surrounded by razor wire, and that is exactly as it should be. Every day the reader has to wade through 8 or 10 "articles," many of them both enraged and banal, which amounts to a reign of terror. Does the Guardian actually believe in this, or is it all to boost sales? It is hard to say, even as the Guardian is increasingly hard to stomach.

Writers are infactualy in correct as I can spell they can't right. It's speaks for its self sput trash.

How can they expect anyone to take them seriously when they put out TRASH like this. The article obviously was penned to promote an ex Russian spy's book that just came out... Come on man! You know it's the thing!

Having just finished an article regarding a slave uprising in 1763 Guyana, I was then asked to read a scathing comment on US politics, Biden's supposed ability to lead my country out of chaos and the hope for this upcoming 'reset'. Aside from the incessant attack on conservative Americans, I wonder if Guardian readers truly expect a new world in the near future? Guardian readers are supposed to young, educated Londoners. It seems they have no understanding of history if they fall for this propaganda. Shame on the writers and editors who promulgate such biased and ill advised thought.