I just read most of this article and have to assume it was AI generated. This is a new low. Is this what we have to look forward to on the internet now?
https://screenrant.com/woman-king-rotten-tomatoes-score-reviews-good-why/
Literally just a bunch of idiots who don't understand tv shows but will still make dumb top 10's I don't like Mojo but even they make top 10'a better then these idiots stop showing these idiots give a better websites
The people writing the articles really have no clue about the subjects they're writing about and do not understand what fans really think about the subjects they wrote about. Very biased opinions instead of actually reporting on the facts.
They hire just about anyone. Just saw a link on Google titles "write for us". Clicked on it and it's your name, phone number, and email with OPTIONAL boxes to state your merit and any ideas you'd have once hired. Every single topic, whether it be videogames, anime, MBTI, cars, celebrities -- you name it -- is completely off and very obviously not researched. If you want anything accurate, don't go to them. Sites such as The Gamer, EuroGamer, Polygon, Forbes, etc., are also highly inaccurate. ScreenRant seems to be the most inaccurate and the most consistently inaccurate.
Nothing more than click bait garbage. I don't mind click bait if the content is decent but ScreenRant is baiterificly cringey with horrendous writing and terrible content to go with it.
They are joyously blocked from my Facebook and Google feed. Hallelujah.
This site is by far the WORST site ever! All I want is to read an article. But NO! They won't letcha do that with an Adblocker! And all the ads these days are scam ads!
99% of screenrant's content is absolute hot garbage. The rhetoric gets tiresome a mere few sentences in. The catchlines that they cast out onto the interwebs never live up to the hype. Screenrant is like the internet's equivalent of JaMarcus Russell. They are NOT worth your time, trust me. Quality writing or entertaining content is scarce.
I recently saw an article involving my all time favorite game and how it should be more lgbtq relatable. The person who wrote the article OBVIOUSLY had not played game before or the original to make sure stupid remarks through out the entire article.
This person clearly just wanted their dumb article clicked on just for hits.
The people who allow such idiocracy to be put out there for the whole internet world to see should be ashamed to even be called journalist but hey that's how all "journalist" are these days. Uninformed and desperate.
(I am gay and I took offense to the article FYI)
Even if you can get past their political agenda, they clearly aren't fans of the characters and movies they cover. My guess is they decide on a topic that'll get views, they do just enough research on the important characters to look like they knew about them before, and if they can't find enough material for their topic they'll ignore/twist/cherrypick the story until they find what they want.
Well for one they're constantly making up things.
They rarely put sources to anything.
And they're constantly making up problems in shows ot movies that aren't even problems or weren't problems to begin with.
I'd suggest firing most of their writers and hiring new more well thought out writers to overall make their site much more better.
Literally steals its content from smaller YouTube channels. Distasteful and downright wrong. But hey, they have a ton of funding so I guess it's the American way.
I would definitely say that ScreenRant is one of the most frustrating film and TV sites out there. Their content is inconsistent and it hardly even looks like their authors watch the content they're talking about. I've read articles that are like "10 Things About______ That Just Don't Make Sense" but in honesty, it turns out being 10 things about this article that don't make sense. Every single point that they make is such a huge reach that I would like to get in touch with the Editor to send them some stretching tips to ensure that the authors aren't hurting themselves from reaching so far. I remember, however, things used to be really good quality but now I just get second-hand embarrassment whenever I read one of their articles.
So I looked up the age of an actor during their time at gossipgirl. The first line in screenrant 'review' had a major spoiler in the first line of the actors age. Really!?!?!?! Why add a major spoiler in line 1 and without warning. Wtf reads screenrant? No me EVER again. My first and last time. I'd give them a -5 if i could
$#*! you screenrant and Zackerie Fairfax. Fallout 2 is the best fallout game and if we didn't have fallout 1 we wouldn't have any Fallout games. Zackerie Fairfax you broken condom of a person go back to being a wank stain.
What really makes me mad is that they're too cowardly to enable comments on their articles, likely because they know how negative they would be.
Most of their articles show they only picked one link on google and skimmed the page, your view gives them ad money, dont give that to them
Terrible website with terribly written opinion based articles. The only reason I think they have any relevance is as an example of how not to run a website on films.
The most horrible display of biased article writing I've ever seen. Circular reasoning, poor arguments, all to push and validate the unjustified opinions of few people with bad taste. Tasteless.
I read one of ur lists and that's when I lost respect completely. Ur list on character way more powerful than sasuke and naruto was dumb, poorly written and downright wrong. I felt like ur writer hadn't watched a single episode of naruto before even drafting the list. A big disapointment. Try and correct it.
It's not a coincidence the videos are 10+ minutes long. It's so they can throw more ads on them. But that results in videos that just draaaaaaaaaaag AND their conclusions aren't even accurate. Seriously, STAY AWAY. The only reason it doesn't have 0 stars is because of Ryan George's Pitch Meeting videos that are worth 5 stars. So when I decide to give SR 1 star, you can tell just HOW LOW the rest of the quality on this site it -,-
Hi Nicolai, glad you enjoy Ryan's videos. We love them too. As for the other videos, YouTube has changed their algorithms repeatedly - and recent changes favor longer content. It's not that we want to put more ads in them. You can see the same shift a lot of creators had to make around the same time. We're always reinventing the YouTube channel and trying to make it the best it can be - and I'll take your feedback to the team.
Overview
ScreenRant has a rating of 1.4 stars from 117 reviews, indicating that most customers are generally dissatisfied with their purchases. Reviewers dissatisfied with ScreenRant most frequently mention and fake news. ScreenRant ranks 315th among Movie sites.
- Visit Website
- Ogden, UT, United States
- Edit business info
Company Representative
- Sitejabber’s sole mission is to increase online transparency for buyers and businesses
- Sitejabber has helped over 200M buyers make better purchasing decisions online
- Suspicious reviews are flagged by our algorithms, moderators, and community members
Similar businesses you may also like
See more Movie Businesses
- Sitejabber’s sole mission is to increase online transparency for buyers and businesses
- Sitejabber has helped over 200M buyers make better purchasing decisions online
- Suspicious reviews are flagged by our algorithms, moderators, and community members
Hello Ryan, I'm not sure what you mean by "political agenda" and there's a certain irony to you cherry-picking articles on the site you disagreed with to make that claim. Our writers come from diverse backgrounds and opinions. A libertarian even moderates our comments. No article is ever shot down for not adhering to an "agenda" or "won't get enough views". Interesting topics with interesting takes that our readers will enjoy (or be challenged by) dictate what goes on the site and what does not.