BeautifulPeople

I support this service only because attractive healthy people have rights too.
We are all sick of swiping passed photos of sick and disturbed people who think they are perfect.
This is called natural selection and those who cry about it should accept the cards they are handed and stop pretending they have a chance with another person who is truly healthy and attractive.
A woman who is ugly or over-weight should not believe they have a chance with someone who is not.
Stop wasting our time by blaming us for having the right to choose.
Stick with your own kind and stop complaining because there are plenty of websites to accommodate your perspective about yourself when others may not agree.

I was a member for only five weeks.
I had someone person troll me on the site and asking for my photos to be removed then I had probably same person say I didn't look like my photo so the managers suspended my profile.?
I had my photos verified and all were taken in the previous twelve months. They were all very good clear photos with no filters. The managers never even checked and just suspended. Tried to contact and they didn't respond. The photo below is the one complained about taken in San Carlos restaurant Liverpool on Saturday 22/02/20. I don't think I look to bad for 55 yrs.

This was a total waste of time. An expensive site, with hardly any members. Shallow in concept. I know people who weren't allowed in as not pretty enough, yet some of the members were no oil paintings!
When I didn't renew my subscription after a month, I was offered a discount because I was popular. What a load of rubbish!

In 4 hrs I had 90% "IN" of 254 votes. Now at 282 votes, 24 hrs later, I'm at under 40% positive with "Absolutely Not" going from perhaps 5% of the vote to now 60%. Call me a skeptic, but the math doesn't seem to work such that 28 more votes turned the current status by around 50 points to the downside.

Just as a reference, I've used site but I believe is cold "Am I Good Looking". The algorithm stated that I was and that I had a 76% face symmetry which is widely considered what the brain processes to make a decision on looks. George Clooney has a 72% face symmetry. I'm in my fifties which is older than the average person there. But I still have a problem with how my rating changed so drastically with around a 10% increase in the number of votes.

BeautifulPeople are a bunch of narcissistic mother $#*!ers they expect you to be like their best members. Honestly it's like look at a catalogue everyone looks the same no matter what their basically saying if you're fat screw you well i got something for you beautiful people screw you to.One other thing the site has no forgot email option i forgot my email address because i used a temp email address and forgot to write it down.

I'm not being churlish (I was turned down), but while my photo was being judged I saw many of the female members' images. They all looked highly photo shopped and fuzzy, and many were downright ugly. There did not seem to be any classically ''pretty'' looking women.

I've never been called ugly -- that's an accurate photo, and I'm surprised I got such a huge ''definitely not'' vote, which implies I'm unbelievably hideous. Oh well, I'll wear a paper bag over my face from now on!

It seems to me that a lot relies on looking trendy and full of yourself. Background, clothes, lighting, and hair styles are important too. If you could see the men who were accepted it might give you a clue, but that's difficult.

I think it's a site best avoided. If you think you are good looking, go to a ''normal'' dating site, and you'll stand out more!

Hi just joined up (Jun 2022) and it asked me to reach out to other members for votes. There were no members presented that had been active within the last month. This site looks like its dead.

I'm 17 hrs away from being voted out.

I opened at 35% approval, after posting no profile and one photo.
After completing profile and adding pics, I shot up to past 50%

Then, without any other edits, I immediately shot back down to under 50%.

It's obvious there is a herd mentality here, clique that vote in unison, and alert their peers how to vote when they want someone booted off.

I, for one am not fooled. I'm n not God's gift to women; however, the shift of momentum so rapidly defies logic. It's okay. 40% liked me. That's plenty.

Rather than a dating site, it looks like a photo gallery. There is just no activity whatsoever going on. I subscribed and was easily accepted, and tried to pay for one month. I got a visit here and there, one single message in a month, sent quite a few just to try, but about 95% of the women in there are non-paying members (which I found out only after paying), so they are not allowed to read and respond to the messages they receive. So basically all you can do is surf profiles and look at pictures. Wasted money, wasted time, as regards me.