No positive highlights yet
It is so great to listen to and! I enjoy the chat because they are respectful and factual. She covers all types of subjects and interacts with the chat. I have been to other channels and it was awful. I found websleuths and would watch when I have free time. Than the stay at home Covid. Her and the subs have helped me through the stay at home. It's a amazing experience. If you blue she will chat with and the amazing people who are in the chat will as well. The websleuths community over all is a positive experience!See positive reviews
Lots of rumor and speculation. It should be encouraged for members to back up statements with sources or links. Moderators will remove comments referring to the death penalty Moderators will remove comments mentioning race in regards to statistics whether it is white, black, brown etc Tricia lacks credibility. She is an opportunist that purchased the website at the right time.See critical reviews
Tip for consumers: Join into the community that is made up from all walks of life and from everywhere. They are there to talk with and give advice or just listen as needed.
Actually, it's not that easy. You only really hear from them when they censor you.
At one time Websleuths actually did provide a space for good investigatory endeavours. If you look at archives from 2006 era of the site, there was some great research done. But in the last five or six years all the intellect has been banned and you are left with primarily very very old people, who do no research, barely know the facts of the cases they are discussing, and who babble and are annoyed by anyone who interrupts their babble with facts.
I don't know. I suspect they are just not very intelligent people and resent those who are.
It's legitimate in that is is a chat-room blog, it is illegitimate in that what transpires on this blog is the farthest thing from "sleuthing" or crime solving that I can think of. Most people on the site are unfamiliar with detailed facts of the cases, or with forensics. There are regulars who roam from forum to forum in zombie-like fashion, espousing the exact same thoughts over and over again, regardless of the case or topic. There is also a lot of claim to expertise or relevant profession that is supposedly vetted by Websleuths, claims that seem doubtful. If someone says they are an attorney, that alone does not make them qualified to speak to just any legal issue. And any attorney not afraid of a law suit would make this full disclosure upfront. Yet none of the so-called attorneys on the site do this. And if someone presents themselves as an expert or practicing professional, why aren't others on the forum allowed to know what actual qualifications they have and who they are. It's one thing to remain anonymous when you are simply giving an opinion-but when you claim your opinion is based on experience or education, I do believe at that point you should be prepared to reveal yourself, so that people can know the quality of the information they are relying on. Websleuths is a real chatroom blog, but it is a sham as a place of fact and substantiation.
It's their personal fiefdom and imagined source of power. The original intention was probably honorable but in practice it is to prevent anyone daring to question unfair applications of policy or highlighting bias. They like conformists.
Because the owner and the moderators are very biased and set in their ways. They don't want their life narrative or world view questioned. If you go out of your way and post scholarly journal articles and back your sources like I often did, you get demonized by old crows and hens. The entire rule system is screwed. To block, ban, or put members in 'time out' is so childish especially if you break their rule on not discussing "religion, race or politics" If you even mention the world "US government" you will get a point deduction, whatever that means. A rational intelligent individual would understand that on a crime forum one can not avoid race or politics when discussing crime. They are correlated. I understand removing posts like " Trump is the best " Or "Biden is the best" But when people post in intelligent ways and avoid being biased with politics, you still get punished.
Is this your business?
Claim your listing for free to respond to reviews, update your profile and manage your listing.