MSN

Following storys in MSN is becoming too much of a challange, offten followed by ads and two paragraph follow-ups! My 12-yr old could have written.
What continues to be a sore spot is there negativity in reporting, pushing against the GOP with what appears to be clearly slanted reports? While I'm not GOP oriented its become obvious to me that I'm NOT going to get honest reporting from MSN, hence I'm moving on. MSN deserves less than one star in this rating!

Did not get issues fixed nothing else to say I was ripped off paid to get it fixed and it's not fixed

There was a time in our country when news organizations actually cared about providing accurate, unbiased coverage of events. Reporters like Walter Cronkite and Tom Brokaw had integrity... you could trust them. Sadly, MSN has taken biased reporting to a whole new level of dishonest and manipulative news coverage. Their articles are deliberately skewed to conform to their ultra-liberal agenda. You can't trust anything on their site. Additionally, they trash up their site with scores of spam articles that are immediately recognizable due to their horrid grammar. Does MSN really believe the public is so obtuse as to trust their skewed and manipulative reporting? They obviously don't care about integrity, but they apparently also don't care about the damage they are doing to our country by polarizing the public with their fabricated half-truths and deliberate bias. My PC automatically opens to MSN's homepage but I immediately leave. They have established themselves as a wholly untrustworthy organization.

MSN's media focus can be summarized in two words: Trump Bad. It's not even veiled; it's blatant left-wing propaganda. Problem is, you'd have to be dumb as bag full of nails not to realize it. This is why MSN has stopped accepting feedback.

MSN expects its consumers to be sheep. Everything they write is designed to corral thought to their left-wing agenda. The propagandists there actually think that they are that smart and that you are that blissful. They aren't interested in hearing from people that do not fall in line, especially for thought-provoking reasons.

Bottom line is, in order for them to believe what they are doing is effective, YOU have to be idiots. Shockingly, the feedback keeps telling them, in order for them to believe what they are doing is effective, THEY have to be idiots.

It's the sort of "alternative reality" which is "dangerous," and must, therefore, be silenced. In MSN's universe, THAT is a reality which is TOO ABSURD even to be THINKABLE. So, no more feedback. Be silent. Let not even your silence have a sound.

Just keep moving.

JEM

USELESS PIECE OF $#*!,USELESS PIECE OF $#*!USELESS PIECE OF $#*!USELESS PIECE OF $#*!USELESS PIECE OF $#*!USELESS PIECE OF $#*!USELESS PIECE OF $#*!USELESS PIECE OF $#*!USELESS PIECE OF $#*!USELESS PIECE OF $#*!USELESS PIECE OF $#*!USELESS PIECE OF $#*!USELESS PIECE OF $#*!USELESS PIECE OF $#*!USELESS PIECE OF $#*!USELESS PIECE OF $#*!USELESS PIECE OF $#*!USELESS PIECE OF $#*!USELESS PIECE OF $#*!USELESS PIECE OF $#*!USELESS PIECE OF $#*!USELESS PIECE OF $#*!USELESS PIECE OF $#*!USELESS PIECE OF $#*!USELESS PIECE OF $#*!USELESS PIECE OF $#*!USELESS PIECE OF $#*!USELESS PIECE OF $#*!

In response to an article about how the US is not moving quickly enough towards EVs, I posted the following, which was not accepted, despite rewording things several times: "I live in Michigan, travel over 350 miles to visit my parents in the UP several times a year, and generally drive a car for 12+ years. EVs do not even begin to make sense. No charging in Northern Michigan and the UP, massive battery drain in cold weather, and battery decline would mean an EV car is never going to make it to the 10+ year mark without replacing the batteries at SERIOUS bank. I also refuse to buy a vehicle that costs more than $35k in today's dollars, and there are almost NO EVs that meet that price point- even with incentives and tax breaks. And let's not even get started with payload range drops. I am in the construction industry, and we are currently testing an EV truck. The everyday equipment load needed for our field staff reduce range by HALF. Why are we not pushing hybrids instead, an option that makes much more sense than EVs?" On the same page, there are multiple rude comments along the lines of, "Conservatives want to whine about everything they don't like." "All you RePUGs want is to burn oil and destroy the planet." "You are a More On & unless you are an engineer, I doubt you understand what range and battery capacity actually mean." "If you idiots didn't live in the middle of nowhere and waste the planet's resources, you would understand EVs need to be accepted."

So, please, if someone could explain to me how my comment is disallowed while the name-callers get through, I would appreciate it. The blatant fact is that MSN discriminates against conservative viewpoints and in favor of the hostile deranged left.

Nice to get news story links on home page. Low starts are probably from people who think the news is fake. Lol