There's very excellent information but this site has seriously been affected by negative search algorithms. The top results usually wikipedia chussodovsky then reprints and finally the site itself maybe. That's one aspect of gatekeeping. The other is the magazine is becoming a lot more selective. It seems they prefer donors, alternative establishment names with fancy titles, and then popular conspiracy theorists. This helps advance the credibility of an alt establishment, fine. But these tend to use hubris & gatekeeping for their own hidden agenda such as capitalist profiteering, divisiveness, and ownership of the message. I can see why millennials dont give a darn about politics anymore. Dr. MC himself is exceptionally hardworking kindly and well-informed. Its too bad their tv channel doesnt show up on searches.
Won't see this news on the news. Not a left/right site. Rated as 'safe' by 'easycounter.' Some articles go deep, while others include personal passions and are shallow as a result. Here's a sampling of articles that were interesting:
1. Plan for Africa: (never mentions the banks). Basically says, White man = bad man).
2. Plan for the Middle East (not the 1st to disclose this information. Dr. Robert Mock of Biblesearchers, also states this plan).
3. False Flag or real? Done by Hillary's enemies or by Hillary's team? Wouldn't be surprised if he's not dead either.
4. Zika Ownership:
5. Israel is Russia:
40,000+ articles like these. Some good, some not.
Canadian Based Global News Stories Alternative News Sources
Interesting site some stories look like Wikileaks embarrassing revelations of stuff governments or big business would prefer to keep hushed up and the public are pleased to have exposed.
Other stories are more National Enquirer / Worldwide Conspiracy Theory stuff amusing at best, but not very convincing.
Global Research seems to have originated from an anti-big business, anti-globalisation position but now carries a whole raft of news stories.
Spinning through the stories on offer, there are quite a few that I am interested in some from clearly biased sources with particular bees in their bonnets, others thoughtful and well reasoned analysis that could easily have justified publication in heavyweight mainstream press.
The website is cluttered, but the archive is pretty good. A lot of the stuff is pretty fringe but keeping an eye on articles from fringe groups is often a worthwhile exercise. And just because they are fringe doesn't mean that they are always wrong Read with a sceptical eye, but you might find some gems.
Did You Find This Page Useful?
Business owners: What’s your side of the story?
Manage your business