Developed in part with a grant from
the National Science Foundation reviews

Is this your business?
2 reviews

2 Reviews From Our Community

All Reviews

51 reviews
283 helpful votes

This site appears to be just a tool by its owners to launch personal attacks on people and entities they don't like.I didn't really get the feel that I was reading views coming from an objective place.It manages 2 stars only because its web page is not as ugly and disappointing as its content

SandDab D.
147 reviews
84 helpful votes

This site claims to give the 'real' news and exposes the people that give the 'fake' alternative news. Calls the fakes CIA plants. Included in the list of CIA agents is Henry Makow, whose site I've already reviewed. The site names Wayne Madsen as another. Mr. Madsen has written a bunch on the Doenmeh; is it all fake or twisted truth? Don't know, but Madsen claims that the Saudi Regime is Doenmeh from Turkey by way of Iraq. Would mean that Israel, Turkey and Saudi Arabia are all run by the same genetic line (very likely Russia too), although it's said that Erdogan is anti-Doenmeh and is trying to clean things up.

If Madsen is right, his information is one the biggest modern secrets and BreakForNews would be doing harm. Would mean that the secret Jewish Combatants disguised as Muslims are still running around. Who exactly are these immigrants to Europe? Are they Doenmeh, or Muslims with an agenda sent by the Doenmeh? These are the questions our government would be asking if they were legit. Doenmeh emerged from the Inquisition, in case you don't know, but were allowed to exist by the Church. Why? BreakForNews doesn't examine the Doenmeh and it may have overlooked that piece. Maybe not.

(Old) I give this site 5 stars for questioning the other narratives and providing a forum to discuss issues. The owner might be right about the various CIA plants, but that doesn't tell us whether some of the stuff they say is true or not. Would like to see the owner's opinion on the Doenmeh.

*6/18/16: Contacted 'Fintan' from BFN for examples of disinfo. No response and it looks like the data on BFN is 11 years old. Key problems w/ BFN's assertions:

1. Says disinfo sites/people downplay America's leading role in the conspiracy but then says on the same page, "America is JUST the enforcement arm."
2. Disparages patriots as a "fringe" group.
3. Bankng role downplayed
4. Uses the catch phrase 'CIA' to name all the disinfo people even though the owner states many just figured out what was happening incorrectly.
5. No individual analysis on the alleged disinformation specialist (actually, a few).

Conclusion is that the owner of BFN should remove his disinfo list until each name on the list gets its own analysis (there's one on Sibel Edmonds). Not righteous to make accusations with no real evidence. Overall, might lead people away from the truth and gets only 3 stars until this is fixed.

Customer Questions & Answers

Questions? Get answers from the staff and other customers.
Note: this is not for reviews - click here to write a review
Get notified about new answers to your questions.
Posting guidelines
Typical questions asked:
  • How long does shipping take?
  • What is the return policy?
  • Where is the company located?

Did You Find This Page Useful?

Sites You Might Also Like

Business owners: What’s your side of the story?

Register now for free – get notified of new reviews, respond to consumer feedback, add new photos to your page and much more.

Manage your business
Have a question about
Post Review