Eurogirlsescort
Questions & Answers

There are no visible consequences for advertisers repeatedly caught using fraud, bait-and-switch, or impersonation. I reported an agency running over 30 duplicate profiles using the same photos, phone numbers, and videos but under different names (e.g., Polina, Karolina, Bianca, Katerina, Mia, Diana, etc.). The fraud involved agreeing on one girl, then sending a completely different person to the meeting. I submitted clear evidence: WhatsApp screenshots, links, phone number overlaps, and video matches. Support (Theresa) initially removed a batch of those profiles. But within a week, the same advertiser came back with new names and identical materials. I sent updated evidence to both email and the built-in “Blacklist” feature — and never received a reply through the blacklist system. Not once. There’s no ticket ID, no confirmation, no follow-up. All actual interaction happened over email, and even that was inconsistent. When I followed up with new cases, another agent (Nela) said my proof wasn’t “actual evidence” without explaining why — despite it being almost identical to what was accepted earlier. Bottom line: there’s no escalation process, no accountability, and no actual blacklist system that functions transparently. From what I’ve seen, repeat offenders face zero consequences and can continue uploading new profiles endlessly.

I’ve submitted honest, specific reviews for multiple escorts I met — all following the review guidelines (no slurs, no doxxing, no unverifiable claims). Still, each review was either silently removed or never approved. Examples of profiles where this happened: • https://www.eurogirlsescort.com/escort/jade/903142/ • https://www.eurogirlsescort.com/escort/hellen/856857/ • https://www.eurogirlsescort.com/escort/veronika/859237/ When I asked support why, they simply said: “We can’t share details — internal policy.” (helpdesk manager Nela) No transparency, no guidance, no clarity on whether I’m even allowed to review again — and if not, why not? What’s worse: this started happening after I reported an agency that ran over 30 duplicate profiles under different names, using identical images, phone numbers, and verification videos. Your support (Theresa) removed those ads after confirming the fraud. But shortly after, the same scammer reappeared with new names and the exact same phone numbers and media. When I reported the new listings with side-by-side comparisons, WhatsApp screenshots, and links — your team (this time Nela) claimed my “proof wasn’t strong enough.” They didn’t request further evidence. They just ignored it. At the same time, reviews I submitted — even for unrelated, legitimate encounters — started being taken down. It’s hard not to see this as retaliation or a silent blacklist for speaking up. Meanwhile, advertisers are free to leave public replies to reviews with zero moderation or verification. They can say anything — insult the reviewer, make up excuses — and it goes live instantly. Check examples: https://www.eurogirlsescort.com/escort-agencies/gg-model-agency/30002/ As well as: https://www.eurogirlsescort.com/escort/diana/777847/ (from agency who mass deploys ads) Their answer: https://prnt.sc/8njAQAnImPpb (for each ad they deployed, which also goes against policy of duplicate ads).

I reported an agency running over 30 duplicate profiles, all using the same photos, verification videos, and numbers. These profiles included names like Polina, Karolina, Bianca, Katerina, Mia, Diana, Diana1, Diana2. Example of a currently live ad https://www.eurogirlsescort.com/escort/diana/777847/ (This very specific ad had 5 different girls from the same entity, and all of them had a practice of sending a girl that the client doesn't know even exist. Same was reported for the currently live ad) Phone numbers used across these profiles included: +381 64 951 2197 +1 202 369 5501 +370 634 91679 +1 213 719 9736 +373 683 58 764 +380 73 164 2105 +7 911 081 6620 They all followed the same scam pattern: you agree to meet one person, they send someone entirely different—bait-and-switch. Theresa from your support team acknowledged my report and confirmed removal of 30+ profiles. Yet within a week, the same agency was back—with the same media and numbers, just new names. I resubmitted all evidence: screenshots of chats, profile links, phone numbers, connection to earlier profiles. This time, your agent Nela claimed it wasn’t enough to act—even though it was identical to the report that previously got those ads removed. If these were removed once for fraud, why are they allowed to return again and again?

Your Terms clearly state that duplicate profiles aren’t allowed. Yet I personally reported an agency running over 30 nearly identical profiles - same photos, same videos, same numbers. After submitting clear evidence (screenshots, WhatsApp messages, phone numbers, profile links), your support agent Theresa removed them. But a week later, the same advertiser returned with the same content under new names. I reported them again. This time I was told my evidence wasn’t strong enough. So what’s the actual policy? And why it isn't enforced consistently?