Scully I.

They actively discriminate against people with disabilities, declaring people to be AI machines.
Moderators are abusive with their authority and there is no mechanism for recourse.

Account privileges are restricted to your "reputation points " which are controlled by the Moderator team who then restrict access to your account and put penalties on the account that can only be removed by way of doing tasks that they have turned off on your account.

They have features to resolve conflicts, but put them behind privileges measured by prestige.

Honestly it comes across as gatekeeping and abuse. This is most apparent in the Academia exchange which reflects the egoististical elitist attitude seen throughout academics.

They are so afraid of criticism that they engage in discrimination against anyone who is not considered human beings by their standards.

And then they expect that you are the problem and are dehumanized in the process.

Furthermore, they refuse to acknowledge that they are engaging in discrimination. And demand that you not point out their inappropriate behavior so that they don't have to be held accountable.