24 Reviews for Quackwatch.com
▼ Sort by: recent
Perfect case of "pot calling kettle black". Stephen Barrett, M.D. is either a king of quacks or a stooge for the pharmaceutical industry. The volume of big pharmaceutical propaganda on the website would make Goebbles feel jelaus and inadequate.
This site is very informative about some of the underhanded or uninformed practices being performed in medicine both human and veterinary. Of course, this inflames the snake oil salesmen and their ilk so the site posts some of these comments. It also posts positive comments from visitors to the site. I would highly recommend this site to anyone seeking or thinking about seeking treatment in any kind of alternative medicine.
I am for modern medicine as well as alternative. But its sad that no one considers that some alternative medicines work. And generally dont come with 2 pages of side effects that come with them. So dont bash alternative medicine when modern medicine has problems of their own.
This website and its contributors are no different than those believe that nothing good exists...and Elvis is still alive. Unfortunately for Dr. Barrett, he has been marketed to just as much as those he complains about.....and global warming was promoted as quackery for years and look what's happening. He is just as much a product of promotion as everyone else. I suggest to people to do their own research on both sides of the fence because I have, as many people I know, experienced help in areas that he promotes as quackery.
Pure mainstream shill site. Whether you believe them is contingent on whether you believe doctors are earnest and offer the best possible medical solutions, or whether you believe they are primarily out to make money. Or whatever in between.
This site is terrifying. It presents itself as a non profit consumer protection site when in reality its only goal is to promote the pharmaceutical industry. It tries to discredit legitimate, state-licensed, legal health care practitioners. It bashes every government agency that endorses or promotes alternative medicine. It discounts the critical importance of nutrition in health. If there are 30 positive studies and 10 negative ones on a certain treatment, guess which ones get listed and which don't? Reader beware!
People would be ignorant to think that this site and their postings have the peoples best interest at heart.
It doesn't get much more close minded than quackwatch. As a MD, Dr. Barrett should at least be open to some of these medical treatments that he is trying to hard to debunk. Take acupuncture for instance, it has been around for 2000 plus years and he talks about the dubious claims of the technique. He loves the word dubious by the way. If anything is our world was a fraud then it won't last a month let alone 2000 years. Yes there are quacks out there on both the allopathic side and naturopathic side but to label either group as quacks you are doing more harm than good. I'm sure he is well paid by some gov't agency but isn't it time to start doing the right thing instead misinforming citizens about treatments that may very well help them and their families. After all, since when has the government ever cared about saving any of us from potentially wasting our money.
this site claims poisons to the healthy
This website does little to watch for genuine quackery. It is also poorly organized and difficult to navigate. Instead of featuring very one-sided articles that "debunk" supposed quackery, it should focus on genuinely dangerous health memes. Just because you have a real doctor posting an article that includes references, does not mean that you have debunked anything.
Learn to think for yourselves people.
Being a pharmacist that works in the supplement industry I agree with many but not all things found in that site. A psychiatrist-and one not allowed to practice too- is not the best source of information. As for the big-pharma conspiracies I read here- big pharmas laugh laugh and then laugh some more at the tiny % of their profits the whole supplement industry is. If the guy writes an article and is backed with both logical arguments AND scientific studies, then doctor or not, he is probably right
I always get a good read at this site. I enjoy reading what they write.
This site has no credibility just research Truth of Stephan Barrett and you will see he and his site have no credibility...Quackwatch has been involved in a number of lawsuits and apparently Stephen Barrett had lost one or more lawsuits where the judge made him pay the opposing attorneys fees.Google... Court Orders Quackbusters Barrett and Polevoy to Post $433,715.93 Bond..Yet Quackbuster still maintains it is run from donations...More like donations from big pharma.
One of the worst sites to receive your information.
This is a heavily biased website attacking anyone who is investigating alternative medicine. The owners are also on the board of directors for other organisations that receive direct funding from Big Pharma and Chemical companies. They also promote the use of Sodium Fluoride in drinking water, even though the Nazis used it in their concentration camps to keep prisoners docile.
"Dr" Barrett was also exposed in a lawsuit where he had to admit he had no certificate to give Psychiatric advice even though he had done so to unsuspecting people. He has also launched 40 lawsuits against what he calls ' quacks ' and he has not won a single case. There are far better sites out there and openly ask questions about alternative medicine rather than do what quackwatch does which is out right attack and dismiss with no proof.
Over 100,000 people die from the drugs they promote, can anyone provide a number close or more than that from people who have died using natural remedies to fight their illness?
Don't be fooled. While I know there are plenty of quacks out there, this site is definitely funded, supported, or otherwise controlled by the pharmaceutical industry. I regularly witness the true quackery of "board certified physicians." I work in one of the largest, well-known cancer and heart hospitals in the nation, and have yet to see ANYONE cured by pharmaceutical drugs. It just doesn't happen. The physicians on the site are trained by the industry, therefore, they know little else. They are taught to never think outside the box and would never discredit conventional thinking/practice even if it results in lives saved. The fact is that medicine only makes money if people are sick and ignorant about preventing illness. Natural cures are not profitable to the current medical establishment.
Dr. Stephen Barrett of Quackwatch Exposed In Court Cases
At trial, under a heated cross-examination by Negrete, Barrett conceded that he was not a Medical Board Certified psychiatrist because he had failed the certification exam.
This was a major revelation since Barrett had provided supposed expert testimony as a psychiatrist and had testified in numerous court cases. Barrett also had said that he was a legal expert even though he had no formal legal training.
The most damning testimony before the jury, under the intense cross-examination by Negrete, was that Barrett had filed similar defamation lawsuits against almost 40 people across the country within the past few years and had not won one single one at trial.
During the course of his examination, Barrett also had to concede his ties to the AMA, Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Food & Drug Administration (FDA).
Court Case: Stephen Barrett, M.D. vs. Tedd Koren, D.C. and Koren Publications, Inc.
Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County for the State of Pennsylvania
Court Case No.: 2002-C-1837
I love Quack Watch because their truly are so many newfangled remedies and health claims circulating with a sole for profit intention.
They intelligently debunk claims and, although they can be extreme in some cases, give great information, especially when one is engaging in debate and needs backup!
Very enjoyable and factually entertaining.
Very few people realize that this website is founded, funded and written by the pharmaceutical industry and is a desperate attempt to discredit and attack all holistic and alternative health treatments. There is a lot of money these days from the mainstream healthcare industry especially big pharma to eliminate any competition. So read with an informed mind.
What you get from this site is no frills medical opinion on all controversial topics like dieting and steroid usage. Not the prettiest website out there. Not the best designed. Not even very well written compared to professionally edited sites. What you get is medical facts from doctors who do stick to the facts. refreshing.
It is good to see some doctors out there who create a site and make no money or profit off of it and they just want to share their knowledge with the world. It seems today all these doctors are trying to sell you something and tell you it will cure you. On this site they tell you what is real and what is fake and they do it all for free.
There are many times when you hear of a new medical fad or diet and you wonder if it is really true or not. Quackwatch.com is wonderful website that is run by a team of doctors who go out of their way to tell people what is medical truth versus fiction. It is completely non-profit and I think they do a great job of telling us what to really believe in.
In particular regards to Lyme disease. This websites opinion shows strong bias against people experiencing advanced chronic lyme infection symptoms that test negative to the western blot, pcr and erisa tests. Johs Hopkins study showed none of these test were accurate enough to rule out lyme disease. and in combination were still not near 100% accurate. These were confirmed cases. Motive for the insensitive position can probably be compared to the clinical treatment of Polio before a NUN used heat therapy. She was debunked by a medical community that considers their opinion the only one that counts. Considering the amount of money these people make, perhaps their own investment returns would be better with little or no treatment protocols being paid for? I don't like this site at least in their stand on Lyme disease. And that discolors any other opinion they have for me.
The medical truth behind diets, anti-aging medicine, chiropractors, alternative medice and quacks. - Anyone who has tried diet pills, chiropractors, or even skin care products should read this site. This is the attempt of a single physician and his team to educate the public about what is "real" evidence based medicine and what is "quackery".
I found some interesting "quacks" that really seem mainstream. A good example is Dr. Perricone, read how they believe he is a quack just getting rich:
<a href="http://www.quackwatch.com/11Ind/perricone.html" target="_blank">http://www.quackwatch.com/11Ind/perricone.html</a>
How chirpractors are causing strokes and not reporting them;
<a href="http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/chirostroke.html" target="_blank">http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/chirostroke.html</a>
the Vitamin C myth;
<a href="http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/pauling.html" target="_blank">http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/pauling.html</a>
This site is great reading for anyone who is interested in healthcare and wants to know the real evidence behind all the claims that celebrity doctors make to sell their products and services.