I wrote an accurate comment and emailed them links to back it up about fentanyl being revenge for the opium wars but of course it was censored for being about China and it might hurt their market with them. My question is if I am able to post 6 articles proving this, what basis did ban this comment. Are their reviewer qualified to do their job because they clearly did not do due diligence. I also have quite a few degrees including degrees in the disputed area. Their reviewers are clearly not up to the task. Companies should run from them and not use them.