We’re in this together! Stay safe with our COVID-19 guide

View
×
Developed in part with a grant from
the National Science Foundation
  • Bookmark

    National Gallery of Art

Corporate Values

Overview

National Gallery of Art has a consumer rating of 5 stars from 1 reviews indicating that most consumers are generally satisfied with their purchases. National Gallery of Art also ranks 6th among Museum sites.

View ratings trends
How would you rate National Gallery of Art?
Top Positive Review

“This is the official American National Gallery of Art...”

Chris O.
10/11/10

This is the official American National Gallery of Art website. It's unexpectedly conservative for an arts site, a minimalist style that you may or may not appreciate, but at least that makes it a fast loader. The page background is uniformly white, not a color generally best suited to displaying all images, but the decision not to use black does mean we don't have to struggle to read colored text. Everything is pretty well organized and there are no nods to Web 2.0 here, as yet, so you just point and click what you want to see or where you want to go, often on a purely textual link, or intuitively, on an image. Instead of opting for a style based on virtual tours, the site is arranged and displayed much more like a print-based guide or catalog. It's not common for a site to choose Quicktime to display movies when Flash is available, but that's what has been chosen here, ensuring that video downloaders designed to capture material from YouTube-like sites are out of luck. And QT may stream very slowly, making for a longer wait than you expect from Flash. However, at least one of the Firefox downloaders will handle QT so check that out if you prefer, or need, to download and watch offline. One way or another, the various video podcasts here should be available to all, with a little preparation. The site has a somewhat academic feel, without being too pretentious about it. It's quite heavy on text, sometimes offering more than a screenful of information about one work, and although the language is often scholarly it's also quite accessible. If you find an artists' work inartistic, or his motives unfathomable, the commentaries here do help you to see more objectively. Those of us with photographic interests will also find a significant collection here including the works of Fox Talbot, dating back to 1834. Truly historic, as well as historical. If you're looking for a gallery site that doesn't place content after style in the interests of popularization, this is one you'll enjoy.

See positive reviews

Reviews (1)

Rating

Timeframe

Other

chriso1
655 reviews
3,169 helpful votes
October 11th, 2010
This is the official American National Gallery of Art website. It's unexpectedly conservative for an arts site, a minimalist style that you may or may not appreciate, but at least that makes it a fast loader. The page background is uniformly white, not a color generally best suited to displaying all images, but the decision not to use black does mean we don't have to struggle to read colored text.

Everything is pretty well organized and there are no nods to Web 2.0 here, as yet, so you just point and click what you want to see or where you want to go, often on a purely textual link, or intuitively, on an image. Instead of opting for a style based on virtual tours, the site is arranged and displayed much more like a print-based guide or catalog.

It's not common for a site to choose Quicktime to display movies when Flash is available, but that's what has been chosen here, ensuring that video downloaders designed to capture material from YouTube-like sites are out of luck. And QT may stream very slowly, making for a longer wait than you expect from Flash. However, at least one of the Firefox downloaders will handle QT so check that out if you prefer, or need, to download and watch offline. One way or another, the various video podcasts here should be available to all, with a little preparation.

The site has a somewhat academic feel, without being too pretentious about it. It's quite heavy on text, sometimes offering more than a screenful of information about one work, and although the language is often scholarly it's also quite accessible. If you find an artists' work inartistic, or his motives unfathomable, the commentaries here do help you to see more objectively.

Those of us with photographic interests will also find a significant collection here including the works of Fox Talbot, dating back to 1834. Truly historic, as well as historical.

If you're looking for a gallery site that doesn't place content after style in the interests of popularization, this is one you'll enjoy.

Q&A (0)

Questions? Get answers from the National Gallery of Art staff and other customers.

Posting guidelines
Typical questions asked:
  • How long does shipping take?
  • What is the return policy?
  • Where is the company located?

Sitejabber for Business

Gain trust and grow your business with customer reviews

About the business

How do I know I can trust these reviews about National Gallery of Art?

  • Sitejabber’s sole mission is to increase online transparency for consumers and businesses
  • Sitejabber has helped over 100M consumers make better purchasing decisions online
  • Suspicious reviews are flagged by our algorithms, moderators, and community members
Have a question about National Gallery of Art?

Is this your business?

Claim your listing for free to respond to reviews, update your profile and manage your listing.

Claim Your Business