We’re in this together! Stay safe with our COVID-19 guide

View
×
  • Bookmark

    DianaSpeaks.info

Corporate Values

Overview

DianaSpeaks.info has a consumer rating of 3 stars from 2 reviews indicating that most customers are generally dissatisfied with their purchases. DianaSpeaks.info ranks 9th among Paranormal Activity sites.

View ratings trends
How would you rate DianaSpeaks.info?
Top Positive Review

“Contrary to what Emily says, I would argue that the...”

Tony P.
3/15/10

Contrary to what Emily says, I would argue that the site includes quite a lot of information not generally known about Diana, but has Emily really listened to over 20 hours of podcast interviews with the entity claiming to be Diana and communicating via Andrew Russell-Davis? Initially skeptical, I became convinced after listening to the interviews and speaking with the Diana entity several times on the phone. Not once has she been caught out with a glaring mistake, and she has indeed given information not readily available. For instance, that she and her son William had a heated conversation on the phone when she was in Paris just before her assassination, for that's clearly what it was, in which he said her behavior on the yacht off Sardinia with Dodi had upset him. Some conspiracy theorists, including Mohammed al-Fayed, say one of the motives for Diana's assassination was that she was pregnant with Dodi's baby. The Diana entity speaking thru Andrew Russell-Davis, while maintaining she was indeed murdered as part of a conspiracy, insists she was NOT pregnant with Dodi's or anyone else's baby. Listening to hours of interviews, the Diana entity also gives loads of little anecdotes about her life with Charles, etc. which are not readily known. As to why the website has not been closed down, well surely that in itself indicates that those who were closest to Diana in life and knew her personally recognize it is Diana? If someone were impersonating your mother, sister or close friend on the Net would you not try to get the site closed and get the person responsible prosecuted? In fact it appears many close to Diana in life know it is her, listen to her words and take heed of them. One friend of Diana's urged Andrew to publish her post-humous book channeled thru him on the site, as he was keen not to make any money out of this project, and indeed hasn't. All the interviews, written messages, the channeled book, etc. are for all to read free of charge. William has been contacted by Andrew with regard to this channeling and a warm reply was sent thanking him. That too is indicative that those closest to Diana in life know it is really her communicating thru Andrew Russell-Davis. However, in view of what happened to Diana in Paris and the subsequent cover-up, it is dangerous for prominent people to openly say that it really is Diana communicating. Still as critical of the Establishment as she was in life, the Diana entity is outspoken and not afraid to say that the Paris crash was no accident, point out the reasons why this is the case, and also to cast doubt on the very future of the Monarchy and comment on the restrictive lifestyle it would mean for William were he to one day become King. The site is there and people who knew Diana in life listen to and read the channeled messages. The powers-that-be leave the site there hoping it will be ignored/ridiculed. To close it down would draw attention to it, as the channeled messages/interviews, etc. are safely stored and can easily be reposted to a new site, and people en masse may then start paying attention. This is why there has been no attempt to close down the present site, although the first Diana Speaks site was badly corrupted (we still don't know why) and eventually had to be replaced by the current one. My advice is don't voice an opinion on this site till you've listened to over 40 podcast interviews in their entirety, and then you are qualified to make a judgment.

See positive reviews
Top Critical Review

“What a load of rubbish, and offensive to all those...”

Emily H.
1/5/10

What a load of rubbish, and offensive to all those who knew Diana especially her family. The fella on this site, seems obsessive, and has read and analized Diana's voice, tone and dialect, there are big flaws on the site, as there is nothing new and not known about the Princess. I'm surprised it hasn't been closed down. I think there are more professional, and better ways to demonstrate our love and compassion for the late Princess, by visiting her official charity sites. This is deeply upsetting for her family.

See critical reviews

Reviews (2)

Rating

Timeframe

Other

tonyp7
1 review
5 helpful votes
March 15th, 2010

Contrary to what Emily says, I would argue that the site includes quite a lot of information not generally known about Diana, but has Emily really listened to over 20 hours of podcast interviews with the entity claiming to be Diana and communicating via Andrew Russell-Davis?

Initially skeptical, I became convinced after listening to the interviews and speaking with the Diana entity several times on the phone. Not once has she been caught out with a glaring mistake, and she has indeed given information not readily available. For instance, that she and her son William had a heated conversation on the phone when she was in Paris just before her assassination, for that's clearly what it was, in which he said her behavior on the yacht off Sardinia with Dodi had upset him. Some conspiracy theorists, including Mohammed al-Fayed, say one of the motives for Diana's assassination was that she was pregnant with Dodi's baby. The Diana entity speaking thru Andrew Russell-Davis, while maintaining she was indeed murdered as part of a conspiracy, insists she was NOT pregnant with Dodi's or anyone else's baby. Listening to hours of interviews, the Diana entity also gives loads of little anecdotes about her life with Charles, etc. which are not readily known.

As to why the website has not been closed down, well surely that in itself indicates that those who were closest to Diana in life and knew her personally recognize it is Diana? If someone were impersonating your mother, sister or close friend on the Net would you not try to get the site closed and get the person responsible prosecuted?

In fact it appears many close to Diana in life know it is her, listen to her words and take heed of them. One friend of Diana's urged Andrew to publish her post-humous book channeled thru him on the site, as he was keen not to make any money out of this project, and indeed hasn't. All the interviews, written messages, the channeled book, etc. are for all to read free of charge.

William has been contacted by Andrew with regard to this channeling and a warm reply was sent thanking him. That too is indicative that those closest to Diana in life know it is really her communicating thru Andrew Russell-Davis.

However, in view of what happened to Diana in Paris and the subsequent cover-up, it is dangerous for prominent people to openly say that it really is Diana communicating. Still as critical of the Establishment as she was in life, the Diana entity is outspoken and not afraid to say that the Paris crash was no accident, point out the reasons why this is the case, and also to cast doubt on the very future of the Monarchy and comment on the restrictive lifestyle it would mean for William were he to one day become King.

The site is there and people who knew Diana in life listen to and read the channeled messages. The powers-that-be leave the site there hoping it will be ignored/ridiculed. To close it down would draw attention to it, as the channeled messages/interviews, etc. are safely stored and can easily be reposted to a new site, and people en masse may then start paying attention.

This is why there has been no attempt to close down the present site, although the first Diana Speaks site was badly corrupted (we still don't know why) and eventually had to be replaced by the current one.

My advice is don't voice an opinion on this site till you've listened to over 40 podcast interviews in their entirety, and then you are qualified to make a judgment.

emilyh
3 reviews
12 helpful votes
January 5th, 2010

What a load of rubbish, and offensive to all those who knew Diana especially her family. The fella on this site, seems obsessive, and has read and analized Diana's voice, tone and dialect, there are big flaws on the site, as there is nothing new and not known about the Princess. I'm surprised it hasn't been closed down. I think there are more professional, and better ways to demonstrate our love and compassion for the late Princess, by visiting her official charity sites. This is deeply upsetting for her family.

Q&A (1)

Question:

Perhaps it is a bit much to swallow that people, especially princesses, can communicate after their physical death but as a medium myself i have to say that while it might be hard to understand it is indeed a fact. since i am one who deals with the paranormal (above normal) reality and am not limited just by my physical senses and the indoctrination given to us via religion, society, and even our own family i have polled a great many people, normal everyday type of folks, about whether they feel they have had any contact with their departed loved ones. it was astounishing to even to me (someone who works in this field) that i got more yeses than nos and many of the stories relayed to me about this topic were indeed riveting! i even had a catholic priest admit to me of his own psychic abilities and the fact that he has been visited by those who had given last rites for, sometimes even after a year or more! however, due to his "job" and the stance taken by his "employers" he has not spoken of it often. so yes, consciousness after death is a reality and for those trained/naturally gifted it is possible to communicate across the "veil" of death. there are even scientists who now work with electronic recording equipment that is sensitive enough to record these voices, though you won't hear about it (for some time yet anyway!) on the nightly news. diana most definately was quite capable of finding avenues for communiccation since she believed in the process while living and upon her death would have no doubt sought ways to do so. i too heard from diana the night she died and was not expecting it. so just because you don't understand it or haven't experienced it does not mean that it does not exist. it might just mean you need to open the mind further for more knowledge to be able to enter.

Can’t see your question? Ask to get answers from the DianaSpeaks.info staff and other customers.

Posting guidelines
Typical questions asked:
  • How long does shipping take?
  • What is the return policy?
  • Where is the company located?

Sitejabber for Business

Gain trust and grow your business with customer reviews

How do I know I can trust these reviews about DianaSpeaks.info?

  • Sitejabber’s sole mission is to increase online transparency for consumers and businesses
  • Sitejabber has helped over 100M consumers make better purchasing decisions online
  • Suspicious reviews are flagged by our algorithms, moderators, and community members
Have a question about DianaSpeaks.info?

Is this your business?

Claim your listing for free to respond to reviews, update your profile and manage your listing.

Claim Your Business