We’re in this together! Stay safe with our COVID-19 guide


T J.

  • 2 Reviews
  • 27 Helpful Votes
  • 1 Thank You

Experience: Relationships, Computers & Technology

Member since November 2019

  • Reviews


  • First Reviews


  • Thank Yous


  • Fans


  • Profile Views


Review Distribution

2 Reviews by T


Read some positive reviews, so tried this dating site. Absolute waste of time. Very pleased I didn't part with any money. Lots of women's profiles - most are quite ugly: 2 out of 10 in looks if you're lucky. Probably same for the men. Wrote some nice profiles - waste of time. No-one ever replies to you, no messages or anything. Constantly bombarded with site adverts / invitations to take out a subscription - very expensive so avoided that.
Test #1: logged in a different way. As site came online, faded mosaic of old members photos appeared, reminiscent of well-known scamming date web site from years ago. Looked like clone running in background with new front end, very suspicious. Believe me none of these will ever contact you as all these profiles are empty fakes (long defunct user photos from other failed dating web sites).
Got so many views yet no messages - strange - soon spotted pattern - only got viewed when I was offline. Decided to run more tests to verify if my assumption was true, that all views received were false - purely generated automatically by algorithms in system software running web site.
Test #2: Paused my profile for a while - made it inactive so no-one could see it. Wow, I got so many views and emails saying I need to login asap as XXX or YYY wants to contact me. Really? How was that possible when my profile was not active and thus hidden from view? Bull$"^T.
Test #3: Ran advanced searches using lots of different criteria on online members. Very revealing. For a site that claims to have 40 million singles, searches produced only handful of profile photos or in some cases absolutely none at all. 'There is no-one online at the moment' was displayed as a system message. This is a statistical impossibility.
Test #4: A few token bimbo pictures exist on site - careful these are only there to prise your hard-earned cash out of your hands. Blocked all these bimbos so all searches no longer showed them. Surprise. They kept appearing in all searches. Either block function does not work, or there are so few profiles that they need to keep including all these bimbos to look good. Don't get tempted guys. They're not even real.
Test #5: Ran a special carousel-matching function several times in quick succession. Guess what? It ran out of profiles to show me, which is odd for site that claims to have 40 million singles. What happened then fully confirmed to me this is definitely a big scam dating web site.
Last profile photo repeatedly got displayed as if it was a completely new user each time. It had an age that kept changing to new values - an identical photo of the same woman who is 25, or 26, or 27, or 28, or 29, or 30 and so on. Really? This is not something a user could do in fractions of a second, whilst my online tests were running as they're quite fast. Think about it. The system was automatically generating fake profiles to artificially match same photo to (false) computer-generated data. The algorithm does this presumably to make it look as if there are plenty of different people online, when in fact it's likely that this is not at all the case.
Sure, there will be a few real women on the site. But goodness when 95% of all profiles have no text but only a single photo, it's easy to wonder if any of these are really genuine, likely not. Of the remaining 5% possible real people, many had profiles contained such negative views of men, from members with bad entitlement princess attitudes, that no man in their right mind would ever wish to meet them anyway. So why are you on there exactly?
Looked at the financials for the owner company's marketing and overall revenue figures: 50M+ Euros! Not bad from a business whose stated sole aim is to maximum profit return on investments. My advice: These are scammers of the first order. Dating site? More like One.BIg.Con Please Avoid - Avoid - Avoid like Covid-19.


This is such a dreadful web site. It's mostly full of scammers and very narcissistic women who can't be bothered to write any profile at all, but still manage to post really boring, quite duff photos of themselves.
The people who run the site heavily pamper to these scammers as they're desperate for any content at all. Yet they steadfastly refuse to respond to most complaints or even remove the dodgy comments sent in or posted by creepy users. Many users struggle to reach an average IQ of 20, so don't expect a riveting conversation from them, that's if they even bother to reply to anyone's messages. These women's looks rate about 2 out of 10, they express unbelievable ignorance and massive prejudices like racism and ageism in very poorly written profiles. Their BS narratives often close by asking viewers not to keep pestering them (as if, they'd be so lucky!). Clearly full of catfish, immature dumbo children who want to be / think they're all beautiful bimbos. Avoid it like the plague if you've got any brains.

T Has Earned 27 Votes

T J.'s review of InterPals.net earned 20 Very Helpful votes

T J.'s review of Zoosk earned 6 Very Helpful votes

T J.'s review of Zoosk earned a Fraud Buster vote

T Has Received 1 Thank You

Kris B. thanked you for your review of InterPals.net

“Yes, thanks for writing this report. I hate those guys because they are running a crooked business. They suspended me because I wouldn't skype with another guy.”

T doesn’t have any fans yet.

T isn’t following anybody yet.

Similar Reviewers on Sitejabber


Almost everything about zoosk is a lie. In fact, if they don't like something about your profile,...

Greg P. reviewed Zoosk

Pros: Approvals for profile and description are pretty fast. CONS: Mobile and web versions are...