Mr S.’s Reviews of CourtLinked & more

MR's Profile

Review 1
First Reviews
0
Votes 0
Thank Yous 0
Fans 0
Profile Views

78

Contributor Level

Total Points

Legal Services

“Waste of money, Never performed service I paid them for”

12/10/20

I Filled a small claims case with courtlink, they were going to fill out all the paper work and serve the defendant. I was told they would serve with one of their processors but they claimed that the address was not correct. I looked up who was registered on file with the state, (medical marijuana company) and found the address and the business address. So i provided them with 2 locations to serve and was told they were unsuccessful. I received a call from the court on Monday notifying me that I had a court date the following day, I had no Idea. I tried to contact Courtlink and the website said due to COVID all communication would be done via email no more phone service which I thought was weird. Any way I want to the court and they told me they had never heard of court link and they think I got scammed. I sent an email to court link asking what happened and they responded that they did their job and I provided them with the wrong address. They offered no proof of dates that service was attempted. I reported to the BBB. These jokers are taking up the courts time by scheduling court dates and not informing the client. Im probably not the only person this has happen to, just by the response I received from customer service you could tell they have seen this before. DO NOT GIVE USE COURTLINK

Comments (0)
11.2K Views

Helpful (0)

Thank you

Robbie M. – CourtLinked Rep Over a year old

Mr. Chad Gatzemeyer, filed a lawsuit in Colorado against a shoddy Marijuana Company that owes him wages/monies. He paid $74.95 and provided us their information/address. His case was professional drafted, State Research Completed, approved by him, signed and returned.

His case was filed with the courthouse and trial date was set. The case was then submitted to the THIRD-PARTY PROCESS SERVER (Metro Intelligence) for service and paid in full. The licensed process server informed us and him that the addresses he provided were involved and that entity he was suing could not be located/served.

The claimant is now blaming us for non-service which has no barring’s. Please understand we file lawsuits based on the information you provide us and the information within the state secretary. We do not conduct the serving. Our job is to professional prepare, file and arrange service via sheriff departments, third party process or certified mail.

In regards to his comments about the courthouse; these cases are filed PRO SE; meaning that the paperwork has the claimant’s information on it, not Courtlinked.com and most courthouses/clerks are not familiar about our services because cases are being filed under the claimant’s name.

He is claiming scam, but received a case number, trial date, court stampings and correspondences from the court server of non-service. To assist him, we refiled the case, paid from our pocket for a new hearing as a pending case that we are still waiting for.

The $74.95 he paid does not constitute the work we have done, plus additional fees we paid out-of-our pocket to help him with the additional reset and reserving.

Consumers please understand that blaming our services for non-service of a shoddy/criminal defendant that is evading or a closed business is relevant.

Claimant will receive a FULL refund regardless of the work we have done.

It is not about the money; it is about helping consumers recover monies owed. If it was about the money, we would not be charging $74.95 for our services. We receive dozens of emails daily thanking us for the great services provided and judgments/settlements received.

Full Refund has been applied and we wish you luck with this case and hope that you will remove this irrelevant review based on non-service of your defendant.

We will still be here to provide you assistance regardless of the refund.