Deborah E.

I feel that wired.com is organized and managed by 50 cent army(https://www.voanews.com/east-asia-pacific/who-are-chinese-trolls-50-cent-army) to fool the readers. For example, this link wrote everything about misinformation, falsehood without touching base about reality such as the fact that CCP already mass produced 1800K N95 medical grade masks on Dec 20th, 2019, way before the corona virus was widely spread(see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pNlwmtsvqY for more details):

https://www.wired.com/story/coronavirus-conspiracy-theories/

Exactly, what grounds do they have to claim everyone else's theories are conspiracies?
Can wired.com first explain why Chiu was stealing Coronavirus from a P4 lab in Canada last April(see https://greatgameindia.com/coronavirus-bioweapon/ for more details) and why Ye was stealing virus from Hartford university as seen in https://www.npr.org/.../acclaimed-harvard-scientist-is...? Surprisingly, based on the scientific research, https://www.biorxiv.org/.../2020.01.30.*******v1.full.pdf, this virus has HIV in it! "After the publication of GreatGameIndias story on Coronavirus Bioweapon, suspicious activity was observed tinkering with our database bringing the site down for a couple of days.", as mentioned in https://greatgameindia.com/chinese-biowarfare-agents-at.../. Wired.com should first have answered those questions before judging if others are conspiracies or not. Thanks!