Courtlink web site says serving included with the service. It is not true. If you pay and hope your case served you will loose the case. Just mail your papers to the court and serve by court clerk for $30.00
They also do not refund your money back. Total scam. Be very careful don't waste your money and loose your case. We are going to sue courtlink for reimbursement. They did the same to my friend. Actually class action law suit they deserve.
Thank you for review Mr. Dinkcan. However, as meritless as your claims are we will still be here to assist you with a new filing with refund issued below.
On 2020-08-26, Mr. Dinkcan paid us $74.95 to conduct the filing of his case with San Diego County, plus a $30.00 payment to the courthouse.
The case was professional prepared, file and sent out for service via method he retained (certified mail - conducted by the courts).
During this process, we provided him with sheriff and or private process server on two occasions which he DID NOT retain.
The case was filed (Case Number: 37-2020-00038811-SC-SC-CTL) and the method of service was certified mail serving.
On his trial date, Mr. Dinckan received notice that the defendant was not served via certified; either Mr. Dinckan did not appear in court and or sent in
A correspondence for a reset but the case was simply dismissed without prejudice - meaning he can re-file. If a case is not served, it is not dismissed
Unless the party missed his/her hearing - the courthouse/judge simply issues another date and requires service.
An email was received from Mr. Dinckan that a new case was needed. Without asking for additional fees, we prepared the materials and emailed him the petitions along with
Simple instructions to print, attach court fees and submit to the courthouse.
During the submission of his case, our service fee was $74.95 (with certified mail serving paid and done by the courthouse).
As stated, he received numerous notices giving him an option to hire a third party as Covid19 may impact the delivery of a USPS certified mail receipt; this was not retained.
We are being blamed for the non-service of this case on the method retained by him.
We value Mr. Dinkcan and have sent another notice that we are willing to conduct the service free of charge. In fact, a full refund has
Also been applied regardless of us not being in fault.
It is not about the money! We are an honest company that stands behind each client in a hard line of work against individuals/businesses that evade serving.
REFUND Receipt #3254-3532
Refunded
$74.95