Janey S.

I believe this is a website set up to divert bad reviews of Mailbox Nationwide and ensure they are pushed to 2nd or 3rd page of google. We have mailbox nationwide complaints. We had a very bad experience with Mailbox Natiowide and know of may other people who have had similar experience. Look on this site for true Mailbox Nationwide... but ignore all the 5 star ones which we are reasonably sure have been written by Mailbox Nationwide staff. Scroll to the end to find the real reviews.

This site would appear to have been created by Mailbox Nationwide as a way to ensure that anyone who googles 'Mailbox Nationwide complaints' comes to this site rather than find some very bad reviews about Mailbox nationwide and lots of complaints about Mailbox nationwide. We used Mailbox Nationwide and have substantial evidence that they did not deliver the leaflets as per our contract. We are also aware of many other people who have had very bad experience with Mailbox Nationwide. Mailbox Nationwide have several county court judgements against them that it would appear they have not paid. They have an in house solicitor advocate, Gareth Rosser-Davies who continues to act for them even although they appear to be in contempt of court judgements against them. We feel this is in contravention of the SRA code of conduct for solicitors. We have reported Gareth Rosser-Davies to the SRA.

This is yet another dummy website set up by Mailbox Nationwide to divert complaints about their service and push them onto later google pages. We would like to complain about Mailbox Nationwide who we have substantial evidence did not distribute our leaflets. We have also heard from a large number of other people who have contacted us to tell us about their bad experience of Mailbox Nationwide. We have also reported their in-house solicitor advocate, Gareth Rosser-Davies to the SRA for representing a company who we understand does not pay up when county court judgements go against them. We would also like to complain about their paralegal, Katie Grey who is the daughter of Caroline Poclock who owns the company. This is a very negative review of Mailbox Nationwide. You will also see, on site jabber, under their own website, a number of 5star reviews which we believe to be falsely written by Mailbox Nationwide themselves. We may be wrong but so far inspite of repeated requests for details to verify who they are, none of them have been prepared to do that. This is very cynical manipulation of the internet in an attempt to deceive potential customers.

This is yet another website set up to divert google complaints against mailbox nationwide. If you google Mailbox Nationwide, complaints or Mailbox Nationwide reviews the front two pages of google take you to websites that are owned by Mailbox Nationwide and which carry the same 'how to complain to Mailbox Nationwide' page. We would like to complain about Mailbox nationwide as we have substantial evidence they did not deliver our leaflets and they have refused to tell us how many distributers were employed and for how long. We have also complained about their in-house solicitor advocate, Gareth Rosser-Davies who we have reported to the SRA for representing a company who does not pay up when county court judgements go against them. We have also complained about their paralegal, Katie Grey who is the daugher of the company owner, Caroline Poclock. We hare submitting a bad review of Mailbox Nationwide and are submitting this complaint against them.

This company is run by the same people as Mailbox Nationwide. We had a terrible experience with Mailbox Nationwide. In short, we have substantial evidence that they did not deliver our leaflets. Since we have reviewed their website on line, we have heard from people who have apparently had equally bad experiences with their holiday cottage business. We have complaints against Mailbox Nationwide. We would rate Mailbox Nationwide zero. This is a negative review of Mailbox Nationwide. We have a number of other people who are interested in taking a class action against Mailbox Nationwide. Please join us. Call ******* *******. We were disappointed in the behaviour of their 'paralegal', Katie Grey who is the daughter of the owner, Caroline Poclock and in particular of their in-house solicitor advocate, Gareth Rosser-Davies who we have reported to the SRA. Mailbox Nationwide have many outstanding court cases against them that it would appear they have not paid.

We used Mailbox Nationwide because they allowed us to specify rural villages within a given postcode. We asked them to distribute 39,000 of two separate leaflets together. We were initially concerned when no one we knew in the distribution area had received a leaflet. We contacted them and they asked us for specific postcodes so we gave them 5 x 6 digit postcodes. That weekend, a full week after the distribution should have been completed, these 5 very specific postcodes received one or other of the fliers - not both. But surrounding addresses still did not receive the fliers. Our understanding is that there are at least 9 outstanding and unpaid county court judgements against them. Also there are very many complaints on gumtree and other websites from leaflet distributors who have not been paid. Basically, if you do the sums they don't add up. They can't pay what they claim they pay distributors and charge what they charge clients... the sums don't work... certainly in a rural area. We have been asking them to tell us how many distributors they had and how long they were distributing... they have not. Caroline Pocock's daughter, Katie Gray acts for the company as a 'paralegal'. She is a final year student at the University of the West of England and on her blog and cv she boasts that she enjoys appearing in court on their behalf to defend the many court cases that are brought against them. They have an in-house solicitor advocate, Gareth Rosser-Davies, who we were promised would deal with our case but when we asked for evidence that they had deployed sufficient leaflet distributors for sufficient time to distribute 39,000 leaflets for us, he did not do this and opted to pass the case back to his 'colleagues' We have assumed this means Katie Gray. We have reported Gareth Rosser-Davies to the SRA as we do not believe he is acting within their guidelines as a solicitor if he is working for a company who do not pay when county court judgements are found against them.