Thumbnail of user denisem79

Andrew G.

Contributor Level

Total Points
94

1 Review by Andrew

  • snopes.com

8/6/16

I recently checked some things on Snopes just to see if they were biased and I was amazed. I had heard that they were/or became so. Maybe they dont mean to but what they should do is present facts only and they instead impart opinion leaving out facts.
Example -- re the recent "ransom" matter with Iran -- they put that it was "false" that they paid ransom noting what Obama admin was saying. I think a lot of people would disagree this conclusion. They should simply put the facts (including new data from released hostage) and let people decide themselves --- not what a site like this should be doing! If you simply want someone to side with you on the democratic/liberal side then this is a site for you!

Andrew Has Earned 14 Votes

Andrew G.'s review of snopes.com earned a Well Said vote

Andrew G.'s review of snopes.com earned 13 Very Helpful votes

Andrew hasn’t received any thanks yous.

Andrew doesn’t have any fans yet.

Andrew isn’t following anybody yet.

Empty.

Similar Reviewers on Sitejabber

Thumbnail of user zane
2/4/22

Snopes may once have been considered a somewhat reliable 'fact checking' site for those...

Thumbnail of user sandral1240
7/28/21

I read a snopes review from a court case where a whistle blower states that the deaths from the...