Brad S.

The simplicity of sifting through the large membership one pic at a time made it easy to establish physical attraction before either profile was read. This saves a lot of time wasted while waiting for a reply. They see your pic, say "yes" to meeting you, and then you can both look at the profile while you decide how to approach them, or IF you want to approach them. In my case, she had read my profile and contacted me. This eliminated the possibility that my first message went unread. She immediately replied and we had instant chemistry. The only reason I didn't give more stars is because you can't look at the profile before saying "yes" to "meeting" them online. You can't look at all their pics first either. The "yes" for both of you is based on one pic. It's not that the method is bad because it does what's intended. It gets you both talking to potential dates that are attractive to you. You can see the profile after you've both said "yes," before your first message anyway, so the best thing about it is that it saves ALOT of sifting looking for someone that wants to talk to you. In this regard, Zoosk is the best dating site I've found for that, but DO read the profiles first or you're going to fail to 1) Capture their attention by noting something in common between you, compose an opening message that gets them talking about something in their profile, or have anything interesting to say. 2) They might not be in your area. In my case I was prepared to go anywhere to find compatibility. That's what they make planes for isn't it? I was lucky enough she was in my area.
No more bullet points! Do your Carousel homework every day and start talking to them. Zoosk will do just what a dating site is supposed to do, but it can't accomplish it without two human beings that are attracted to each other interacting.