- Browse Businesses
- Guides
- Beauty & Fashion
- Consumer Tips
- Write a Review
- For Business
- Request a Review
- Discussions
- Backed by the National Science Foundation
- Sign up
- Log in
Supplement geek is using a "limited" knowledge base to evaluate products and his only interest is money... he has advertisement sites that pays him every time someone visits his sites or clicks on his "advertisements "... plenty incentive to bag or boast on products that will line his pockets. He has just enough education behind him to be dangerous and is so full of himself and his true intelligence on supplementation. The ONLY reason he gets one star rating from me is because you have to give a rating and one star is as low as it will allow you. Shoddy work on his part and full of opinions, half truths and extremely poor knowledge of science. Irresponsible on his part to being leading people down paths that are truly looking for help and stumble on to his site. He talks about studies and such and shows his ignorance of ANY type of study as not having "human" studies... those in the science field would know that YOU CANT preform human studies until certain protocol is done with other studies on animals, tissue and EVENTUALLY human... wow, most rookies in science know those protocols and he professes to have science education background... BEWARE!
Bernard hasn’t received any thanks yous.
Bernard doesn’t have any fans yet.
Bernard isn’t following anybody yet.
Empty.
I received a response about my earlier comments about Supplement Clarity from Joe C. Who seems to...
Bernard K, I thank you for taking the time post your review although I must respectfully disagree with your assessment of me and my website. I have been investigating dietary supplements since the 1990s. I do not have an ax to grind and I go where the evidence takes me. Yes, I put emphasis on human clinical studies and that is because we are people and human evidence is more important than evidence stemming from lab animals, etc. People studies are just more relevant to people.
Your critique mentioned the ads on my site. These are the same types of ads that Site Jabber uses too. The ads come from Google. Since both and Site Jabber and Supplement Geek (me) give away their content for free, the Google ads provide a very ethical way for website owners to help maintain their sites. Your assessment of how the ads works is not correct.
I have written a more detailed reply to your critique on my website if you care to look at it. Hopefully it will help.