Structured Settlement Quotes

I've a privacy complaint about this company. I used to refer business to this company for 4 years pro-bono when Andrew Cravenho was involved. The transactions generally went well. Then out of the blue they offered to make a charitable donation in my name for a modest amount, which I only agreed to explicity because it was not tied to any particular case. A year later the private donation was used on the SSQ website to defame me, a former customer of SSQ. The same information a prepared on a sucks site. When you do business with SSQ you don't expect private transactions to be publicized. Only Andrew Cravenho and the check writer, purportedly an executive of a Canadian based company that also solicits American consumers were aware of this. The latter (along with his sidekick) denies involvement in SSQ. Apparently management changed in or about July 2011. Maybe that's the problem.

Based on the horrible personal experience as detailed above I wouldn't trust this company with my business again.

Furthermore with a stated address in Hartford CT on the website, the company does not come up as registered with the Connecticut Secretary of State. Consumers deserve to know who they are really dealing with.

Andrew Cravenho's Structuredsettlement-quotes.com also operates Arivify com which is used to identity theft.The website violates various state laws.

Article 1, §1 of the California Constitution articulates privacy as an inalienable right.

CA SB 1386 expands on privacy law and guarantees that if a company exposes a Californian's sensitive information this exposure must be reported to the citizen. This law has inspired many states to come up with similar measures.

California's "Shine the Light" law (SB 27, CA Civil Code § 1798. 83), operative on January 1,2005, outlines specific rules regarding how and when a business must disclose use of a customer's personal information and imposes civil damages for violation of the law.

California's Reader Privacy Act was passed into law in 2011. The law prohibits a commercial provider of a book service, as defined, from disclosing, or being compelled to disclose, any personal information relating to a user of the book service, subject to certain exceptions. The bill would require a provider to disclose personal information of a user only if a court order has been issued, as specified, and certain other conditions have been satisfied. The bill would impose civil penalties on a provider of a book service for knowingly disclosing a user's personal information to a government entity in violation of these provisions.

Article 2, §10 of the Montana Constitution states that "The right of individual privacy is essential to the well-being of a free society and shall not be infringed without the showing of a compelling state interest".