3 reviews for ExpertLaw are not recommended
These reviews are not recommended because our content quality algorithms have determined them to be less useful for users researching this business. Our content quality algorithm makes decisions based on a number of proprietary evaluation factors, and is constantly updating and improving over time. Even though these reviews are not displayed by default, they still factor into the overall number of reviews and the average rating for the business.
Pennsylvania
6 reviews
48 helpful votes

Wanting to make changes, or condoning the negative actions?
September 22, 2017

To update, the thread that prompted this review is dated 6-17-13, titled "Support Increased, No Deviation Allowed" and is under the Child Custody, Support and Visitation forum. My username for the site was JustIs. You will see that I was banned, and no, I did not spam or abuse anyone in my posts. Several of the posts (both from myself and the senior members) were edited and/or removed, for what purpose? It appears as though Aaron L. Came here to discredit any negative reviewers, instead of acknowledging any wrongdoing from their site and seeking to make amends. For the record, the issue I posted about was resolved in my favor. For anyone who looks at the original post, you will clearly see that Mr. KnowItAll (ha) and Dogmatique never mentioned that option~ they repeatedly make comments that I am a "fraud" and "only want money". So I ask~ how was that "positive and helpful", Aaron? Why was I banned for simply daring to question your senior members statements, but it is okay for them to make character assassinations as much as they please? I've seen other businesses and services respond to negative remarks by trying to remedy the complaint(s), but I don't think that's what you're trying to do. It seems like you want to excuse the actions of the senior members. I hope I'm wrong, but time will tell.

*Update 9/23 Since the thread in question still has not been removed, and Aaron has now come here to justify the negative actions of the senior members, I will shine a light on the facts of my experience with the site. The issue was that several members made a gross assumption that I intended to live with my husband while claiming to be separated, even though I did not once make that statement. Even after repeating several times that I would not file for separation or divorce, members continued to repeatedly state that it was what I wanted. When I tried to direct the conversation back to getting their legal advice, that is when I was banned. Thankfully, the questions I had posted about were resolved with an appeal hearing and we did not need an attorney. With a little research of our own, we were able to get the order modified. If I had taken the "advice" from ExpertLaw, nothing would have gotten changed. I am wondering why, four years after the fact, Aaron has decided to comment on this old business.

Tip for consumers:

To address Aaron's most recent comments: I updated my review, hence the second review. If I had anything positive to say about the site, I would, but your replies are doing nothing to remedy the situation. I would address the rest of your statements, but that would delete my other post. I'm sorry that you don't like the fact that people are allowed to express honest opinions here, without "senior member" status.

Date of experience: September 22, 2017
Florida
1 review
12 helpful votes

People are rude!
October 24, 2015

All they do is criticize, don't waste you time.

Date of experience: October 24, 2015
Texas
1 review
1 helpful vote

Houston lawyer Riddhi Desai and daughter Shilpi Desai...
September 11, 2014

Houston lawyer Riddhi Desai and daughter Shilpi Desai are identity thieves

Tip for consumers:

Houston lawyer Riddhi Desai and daughter Shilpi Desai are identity thieves

Date of experience: September 11, 2014
Loading...
3 reviews for ExpertLaw are not recommended