Dear SiteJabbers,

Sigh. These deplorable, rip off essay writing sites are like the moles in a game of Whack a Mole...

Right off the bat, all the copy text on the site is either plain wrong or plain weird. Check this copy out, as I know you SiteJabbers enjoy a good laugh and spades of irony:

"There are lots of custom writing companies on the Web, claiming to provide the best custom writing services ever. Unfortunately, most of them cheat on their customers. Having just brief experience, they give you low quality papers written in haste and these papers leave you disappointed and unsatisfied."

Cheat? Ouch! Nooo! WHAT makes you think thaaat? C'mon guys! Lay off the negative sell - NOT a great look.

Oh, and get used to feeling "disappointed and unsatisfied" if you pay these chancers to do a paper for you.

Worse, even THEY don't seem to know what the hell they are actually capable of. Check this weird copy out (take the blue pill and the story ends here. Well, I warned you...):

"If you want to look at a sample essay to evaluate the quality of our essay writing service, then download an essay example from this page. Samples given here are written by our best writers, and the quality of real papers will be even higher then the quality of these examples. We promise that you won't be disappointed!"

Er. So... they, um, will write you a paper that is BETTER than the quality of their BEST writers. Hooookay: an interesting Alice in Wonderland-ish paradox, that.

To their credit (if that's the right word) they actually include samples that are pretty much appalling gibberish. Don't believe me? Here's just one of endless examples. This is deliciously ironic as it is an essay ABOUT English grammar usage, so let's get educated:

"Grammar teaching has been in and out as the trend of fashion
Has fluctuated back and forth."

Nope, me neither. Let's continue:

"Research shows that grammar is the only substance in language
Teaching."

BZZZZZZ. Wrong answer. Lets see if the essay can redeem itself back on planet Earth - and this one is a doozy as it is a literal object lesson in defeating its own argument. Watch closely:

"If you can translate the target language according to its grammar into your own language, you are learning that language. So the debate about teaching or not teaching grammar is really about the purpose of teaching grammar. Do we use grammar to teach about language? Or do we use grammar as a means to enable our students to use language effectively?"

See? The GRAMMAR is mostly okay(ish), but it is still meaningless twaddle. Ergo, I am guessing there IS more to language comprehension than just translating grammar.

As ever, caveat emptor...

Rich