Thumbnail of user jamesr97

James R.

Contributor Level

Total Points
97

1 Review by James

  • Zoosk

9/2/14

Okay, so I was not really going to write a review but after reading all the negativity, I must agree. I initially searched to see what was the best free dating site. I believe that zoosk was rated as #3 or 4. So I joined. I was charged some ridiculous amount for a 3 month subscription. Majority of the members are non-subscribers: meaning that they cannot reply to your messages. If you attempt to provide your email or any other contact information the mediators will block the message. I would say a good % of the members are old accounts. More than 1/2 of the members do not read what you write on your profile so if you actually do like someone they are a million miles away. I also do not believe that many of the profiles are real just do to the fact that you will receive the exact same message from females with different pics. As normal there are quite a few accounts using the regular internet scammer photos that you can find on every dating site. They have this feature where someone clicks to meet you. I have had at least 100 women clock on that and I must have responded to at least half. So 0 have responded back even when you just say "Hello" or "Would you like to chat?" The auto deduct ($) feature is always nice -try getting your money back from the company.

Tip for consumers:
Use the money to buy yourself a nice dinner instead.

Service
Value
Quality

James Has Earned 17 Votes

James R.'s review of Zoosk earned 17 Very Helpful votes

James hasn’t received any thanks yous.

James doesn’t have any fans yet.

James isn’t following anybody yet.

Empty.

Similar Reviewers on Sitejabber

Thumbnail of user kimberlyw2496
4/14/24

This is the second time I have been on zoosk and I guess shame on me. They are not helpful the...

Thumbnail of user jasonw2584
Jason W. reviewed Zoosk
4/2/24

Women don't want to meet like on Jst4HookUp And other legit platforms. I have never had an issue...