I wrote this review after a jerk of a lawyer who argued with me after not answering a simple question that just became a law in California, regarding Real Estate License. He acted all tough because he's in another state. I tried to put a bad review and of course Avvo rejected it. Then I tried to put a positive review about a lawyer who went beyond anyone would to give me advice. He did it all for free, even when I tried to pay. He was a great human being before being being a great lawyer. Mr. Frederick M. Ray in City of Orange, CA. I tried to give him a great review and they turned it down. I have no idea why. Maybe Mr. Ray is no longer or never been part of Avvo. So ask yourselves this question. Why are good and bad reviews being turned down for the website? I didn't use any fowl language or anything that shouldn't be published anywhere. Yet they were. Why are only good reviews of paid lawyers being permitted on the website? Could it be 'conflict of interest'? I am asking that question. I have no evidence one way or the other. Yet something fishy is definitely going on with Avvo. That's for sure. If a review website doesn't let people put honest reviews, why are we using it? I sure don't anymore. All I ever get in the end is 'get an attorney from Avvo'. No thanks. I rather trust other reputable review sites to pick... I picked 2 specialty lawyers for 2 different cases from Yelp and it worked out just fine. Yelp let's me put all my reviews on their website. No Avvo, ever...