George T. the post has been edited

sue c. I had problems with the legal deed poll service to george, seems there are 2 members with reviews on this company on sitejabber, i to would not recommend them either

Sue

Matt p. I just joined site jabber and come across this review "had a read and thought" WTF lol

seems that the member Private U is the Chief Executive of the legal deed poll and is leaveing great reviews for himself :P

G Mountford Chief Executive or Private U, being caught lieing is not good for your reviews mate you should at lest delete your 1st post before leaveing another pmsl ;)

Julia B. I used them and it worked as they said.

gerriant J. We found this service really good. My original document was with me the next day, I was very pleased it arrived so quickly. I spoke interactively with customer services and they were very efficient and friendly. Overall a very good and easy to complete service, with help readily available. Thankyou,

Mustafa G. I don't think I have ever encountered an online service that has been so easy to use and with such a quick result. I would definitely recommend it to anyone. Pay by paypal and have the extra peace of mind.


Fantastic!!

Matt p. OMG unbelievable!!!

Dont make me out to be a liar VOLVIC M.!!!

this guy has just changed his name from Private P to VOLVIC M.

and then 5 mins later they have 2 more good reviews lol

Look Private P or VOLVIC M. I dont care if you threaten me with legal action, i wont be bullied, i may not have ever used your site so i cant rate the legal deed poll but i can see why this guy is unhappy with your company, you are such a con you should be ashamed of yourself ,call yourself a legal team!!! you should be banned!!!

Matt p. another 5 mins later is yet another good review by Mustafa G. i give up am out of here

sue c. erm matt hate to tell you this but the name is Sheila W. now lol

i just got a message asking me to ring them, think am going to be threatened to (eeek) :(

MagdaleneP P. Libel Law

If Georges post was true why did he delete it after the company threatened legal action? The law says that if your comment is fair and reasonable and if you have tangible evidence to support your fair comment you cannot be the subject of an action for libel. George or Alan as is the name the above letter is addressed to only deleted his post AFTER they threatened legal action. If my company was being slagged off and I thought it wasn't true I would threaten legal action.

Most people think that when they leave posts/reviews online that they are ANNONYMOUS - NOT SO:

UK Libel Court Case:

Disgruntled fans of Sheffield Wednesday who vented their dissatisfaction with the football club's bigwigs in anonymous internet postings may face expensive libel claims after the chairman, chief executive and five directors won a high-court ruling last week forcing the owner of a website to reveal their identity.

The case, featuring the website owlstalk.co.uk, is the second within days to highlight the danger of assuming that the apparent cloak of anonymity gives users of internet forums and chatrooms carte blanche to say whatever they like.

In another high court case last week, John Finn, owner of the Sunderland property firm Pallion Housing, admitted just before he was due to be cross-examined that he was responsible for a website hosting a scurrilous internet campaign about a rival housing organisation, Gentoo Group, its employees and owner, Peter Walls.

Exposing the identity of those who post damaging lies in cyberspace is a growth area for libel lawyers.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2007/oct/22/news.blogging

US Libel Court Case:

Last week, a U.S. court ordered Google to reveal the identity of an anonymous blogger who called a New York fashion model, Liskula Cohen, a "psychotic, lying, whoring ... skank" on its subsidiary site Blogger.com.

As soon as Google turned over the blogger's email address, Cohen recognised it as a woman she knew from the New York party scene. According to the New York Post, the embittered blogger's name is Rosemary Port.

http://blogs.findlaw.com/solicitor/2009/08/google-reveal-identity-of-skank-blogger.html


If George and Sue are telling lies I think they better get their cheque books out.